I have been struggling to make some sense of the latest
events in Syria, Iraq, and IS.
I have noted both the trend and demeanor of Obama in toning
down aggressive overseas action relative to both his predecessors and those
against whom he ran for president in both 2008 and 2012.
I have suggested that Obama was installed precisely for this
reason – to tone it down. The Frankenstein’s
monster created by the elite that is behind the US government went out of
control when it was the last man standing, after the fall of the Soviet Union. Instead of effectively shepherding the
continuing trend toward global governance, the USG was making enemies of
everyone.
So the elite decided, via Obama, that it was time to turn it
down a notch. I have seen indications of
this in the writing of various members of the CFR and even Henry Kissinger.
This looked like just what was happening via Syria a year ago
and Russia earlier this year. Despite the
aggressive actions taken by Obama / the USG in both events, imagine if it was
Hillary, McCain, or Romney in the driver’s seat. Nuclear war might already be behind us.
Hence my struggle with recent events.
The
Daily Bell recently ran an editorial precisely on this subject. As many of you know, I am indebted to this
site for the analysis they have done precisely on this type of issue. So I was hoping for some answers. Instead:
But if we look at the muddle in
Africa and the Middle East it soon becomes clear that such regional warfare is
difficult to control and sustain with any kind of narrative clarity.
We have spent the past several
years searching for a sensible and dominant social theme appropriately
implemented; increasingly, we wonder if there is one.
I am not alone in this struggle.
My only conclusion, only somewhat satisfying, is that the
desires of at least some important faction of the elite are continuing to butt
up against the perpetual war-making machine of their creation.
For this reason, it seems to me the success of Rand Paul
will be an important marker. If my views
of Obama’s election are correct, then Rand Paul is the only mainstream candidate
that at least often talks less belligerently than others.
I don't care which puppet they put in the big house as long as it is not Hillary. I will seriously want out of the US rather than have to see her in the daily news for the next 4-8 years.
ReplyDeleteAs for the wars, I think they are tired of being exposed and have decided to take out half of humanity. Any...way...they...can. Bluebird
I know its miles out from the 2016 elections but did you see the current polling for Virginia? 51% for the Empress to 35% for the Randroid. The elite may looking for foriegn policy reform but their lackies love the jolly old empire.
ReplyDeleteThe end game is one world government. America will have to establish full spectrum dominance of the planet for that to happen.
ReplyDeleteCurrently Putin seems to be the biggest obstacle to US led full spectrum domiance of the planet.
I read that at the last G8 summit he attended, Putin refused to eat any of the food laid on for him. He ate food brought from Russia-maybe a wise precaution