CATO has published a “Policy Analysis” entitled “Responsible
Counterterrorism Policy.”
I will not go through a line-by-line review or
critique. I only offer the following:
·
There is not one reference of “blowback.”
·
The only references to “bomb,” “bombs,” or “bombing”
are regarding actions or alleged actions by “terrorists.”
·
The mentions of “Iraq” are limited to
terror-related deaths in that country during the period 2003 – 2008, reference
to the US war in that country, payments to the families of soldiers that died
while prosecuting that war, the financial cost of prosecuting that war, and a
book reference.
·
The mentions of “Afghanistan” are limited to a
reference to the US war in that country, and to a book reference.
·
Not one reference to “Saudi Arabia.”
·
The only reference to “Israel” is the deaths in
that country due to the Intifada.
·
No reference to “Palestine” or “Palestinians.”
·
The only mention of “Libya” is a book reference.
It is difficult to consider as “responsible” a “counterterrorism
policy” that ignores the actions of the United States government and the
actions of oppressive governments in the Middle East such as Saudi Arabia and
Israel.
It is difficult to consider as “responsible” a
“counterterrorism policy” that ignores the oppression suffered by people in
Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan, and Libya.
It is difficult to consider as “responsible” a
“counterterrorism policy” that ignores the concept of “blowback.”
The CIA, along with the Saudis, and Qataris recruit Muslim terrorists to do their dirty work. So CATO should recommend: Stop manufacturing terrorists as the first step to combating them.
ReplyDeleteIs that because when you take those factors into account they're no longer terrorists but freedom-fighters fending off terrorists?
ReplyDelete