Thursday, December 29, 2016

White Genocide

A few days ago, a professor at Drexel University offered: “All I want for Christmas is white genocide.”

The university is apparently taking the situation very seriously.

There are several thoughts that come to mind, easy thoughts.  If the professor wrote this about Black genocide or Mexican genocide or Jew genocide would the university take it seriously or would the professor already be fired? 

Leave it to Robby Soave, an associate editor at, to get this all wrong.

It sounds like the professor, George Ciccariello-Maher, was probably joking.

Maybe.  How does Robby know?  Is genocide something to joke about?  Has the professor come out and said that this tweet was a joke?  What about his past comments along similar lines?

I think it's probably fair to say there's a double standard here: an alt-righter tweeting about black genocide would be more likely to face a Twitter ban.

In a heartbeat.

But then again, the alt-right person might not be joking.

But he might.  How does Twitter know? 

And the professor might not be joking.  How does the esteemed Mr. Robby have any idea one way or the other?  Why give the benefit of the doubt to the white mass-murderer and not the Jew mass murderer?

In any case, I don't really want people punished for saying stupid things on Twitter, though the social network is well within its rights to take whatever action it deems necessary.

It isn’t up to you, Bob.  And it isn’t only up to Twitter.  The university is free to take whatever action it chooses, within the bounds of its policies and contractual terms with the professor.

Drexel should not discourage a professor from expressing his mind on Twitter—if faculty members must worry that any stray thought can land them in hot water, then the university is failing to cultivate an environment of maximally free speech.

This sounds like standard left-libertarian claptrap.  Who says the university is required to hold a policy of “maximally free speech”?  Private property and all that.

Finally, to end with a bang, the witty editor at offers:

University administrators everywhere should resolve to engage in fewer acts of petty censorship in 2017.

Is a comment about “genocide” “petty”?  would it be petty if it was “black genocide”?

As for everyone else:

May your days be merry, and bright
And may all your genocides be white

Good for you, Robby, exercising your free speech and all in a politically very safe manner.  You run no risk with this one.  I also have a similar thought for Christmas: May you be the first in line.


Such so-called libertarians prove themselves time and time again that they should not be taken seriously; due to such so-called libertarians, libertarian philosophy will never be taken seriously by a meaningful portion of the population. 

Robby cannot get private property right.  Robby also believes that just because someone “can” do something under the NAP, that he “should” or “must” do something under the NAP.  No society will survive such licentiousness.  “Libertarianism” will never be the result.

Then again, it is obvious by now that achieving a libertarian society is not the end game of the sponsors of


  1. "if faculty members must worry that any stray thought can land them in hot water"

    A stray thought is "I haven't had Chinese food in a while. That sounds good, maybe I'll get some this week."

    A stray thought is not "Oh Em Gee. Goebbels, Himmler? Do we have any Zyklon B?! I've found my muse!"

    There's a handful of words I can use to describe Soave's article, they don't comply with the rules here though.

    1. Zyklon-B was for killing lice not Jews as your comment seems to imply.

      Watch this:

  2. If Mr. Robby @ Reason has some history of defending free speech from PC University fascism, then perhaps his lame defense of Drexel's pro white genocide policy can be justified. "Only joking" though of course there is no evidence of that.
    Otherwise, Robby seems to be just another self hating white imitation libertarian. Do libertarians have some special obligation to defend advocates of any sort of genocide? Thought not.
    So far Mr. Drexel White Genocide Cheerleader seems to be facing no public or private sanction. Just more SJW hate per script. So I guess Reason has run out of actual libertarian causes to champion. Their limited media bandwidth is now consumed by sympathy for the devil. Sad.

  3. Just in time! The University of Oregon has issued guidelines to be used for disciplining and presumably also firing profs for saying something that would offend a student. It's a list of the standard SJW landmines. I wonder how the wish of genocide for a race would be received by this university's thought police? For some reason, I would guess that such a wish would be treated as a funny joke if directed against a certain race.

  4. The Mantra:


    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    1. Of course. After all, "white"= Racist.

  5. Thank you warmly for covering this issue of vital importance to my people (maybe their yours too, I don't know and don't care). You prove time again to be the most honest and least cowardly of libertarian writers (I was also a fan of the late Ralph Raico R.I.P, but he didn't write much in his twilight years).

    It is with you in mind that I am willing to treat libertarians more generously than I would otherwise be inclined, and considering the criminal complicity by the libertarian traitors at Koch's AIDS ridden e-rag; my attitude should be understandable.

    A sane man might ask themselves why it is that drawing attention to the attempted genocide of the white race is "hateful" or "racist." Why is "White Pride" disreputable in "polite circles" but "Black Pride" is right and good? The answer is of course Cultural Marxism.

    Cultural Marxism was created by Jewish Supremacists for the purpose of destroying the organic fabric of European Civilization (see Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald). The Jewish professor advocating for White Genocide is not an anomaly but symptomatic of the ethnic hostility on the part of (many) Jews towards White Gentiles, as they are the primary group opposing the self-determination of white nations.

    The key thing to note here is that genocide is a criminal accusation and it tells you something about the arrogance of these people that they would openly declare their complicity in a crime that carries a capital sentence. The victories allies had no problem hanging men who had surrendered on far flimsier pretenses than the documented evidence we now have of the conspiracy to commit genocide.

    These rats think their victory will be lasting but history is never finished. What they failed to kill in the 20th century will return again in the 21st with lightning.

    Sooner or later the joke will end and we will have our revenge.

    1. Correction:

      It is not clear if the professor in question is Jewish. However, regardless of whether he is or is not a member of the tribe, the sentiments he expressed come from Jewish indoctrination (Cultural Marxism). Furthermore, I would have no trouble producing a large volume similar statements from Jewish sources, both contemporary and historical.

      "The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word 'German' is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word 'German' strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime ... If you have already killed a German, then kill another one - there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don't count the days, don't count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! ... - Kill the Germans! Kill!"

      And in another leaflet: "The Germans must be killed. One must kill them ... Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast? ... Kill a German! If you are a righteous an conscientious man - kill a German! ... Kill!"

      -Ilya Ehrenburg

    2. "Thank you warmly for covering this issue of vital importance to my people (maybe their yours too, I don't know and don't care)."

      UC, I write about this topic for many reasons - and not only reasons associated with defense of white people or western culture. I feel a similar sentiment toward, for example, the vast majority of Muslims in Middle Eastern countries who - having done no meaningful harm to anyone - suffer terribly due to the criminal interventions of individuals from that same western civilization.

      This should not diminish one bit from the learning I have done in this journey - aided in no small part by your contributions - of the importance of "culture" in developing and / or sustaining something closer to a libertarian society.

    3. **"suffer terribly due to the criminal interventions of individuals from that same western civilization."**

      Huh? The machinations of neoconservative warhawks are NOT Western civilization.

    4. I regret being critical but a point must be made about language and its consequences....

      I did not say that they WERE Western Civilization; I said they were FROM THAT same Western Civilization.

      Or are the likes of Hillary, McCain, Bush, Cheney and the like actually Chinese?

  6. BM, whatever your reasons for covering the topic are, I still appreciate it.

    I too have a measure sympathy for the Muslims who found themselves on the wrong side of the empire, but as you well know, plenty of Muslims are on the side OF the empire. As large as the body count in Iraq and Afghanistan is, Sunni Muslims are not being targeted for wholesale extermination but Alawites, Yazidis, Christians, Palestinians, and Zoroastrians are.

    I do believe we share common enemies with these people in the form of Zionism, Wahhabism, and Americanism. Although, sadly, what we have been seeing is a clash of civilizations model which will increase ethnic hatred between the Arabs and Europeans. This is achieved by getting the West to intervene in the Middle East and importing people from the Middle East into the West. We have only seen the beginnings of what will likely be the bloodiest century.

    'As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood.'

    -Enoch Powell ("racist" who wrote poetry in Urdu).

  7. Twitter and Facebook and other major platforms have positioned themselves as the enemy of white people, especially the white male. Observe for a moment how they implement their policies -

    I am on Twitter, but I pretend to be a black man because if I write as a white male I am always at risk of suspension or banning, especially when subject to a complaint by a PoC. I am fully cognizant of the fact that as far as the platforms are concerned white males are to be monitored and controlled.

    Twitter and the platforms have "property rights" to be certain, but they are enemy platforms that agitate against the rights traditionally enjoyed by European derived peoples. Since this is essentially a war, what of the property rights of the platforms? Frankly, I don't care. Jack Dorsey should be flogged.

  8. This was a good overall post, so I regret being critical but a point must be made about language and its consequences.

    **"Such so-called libertarians prove themselves time and time again that they should not be taken seriously; due to such so-called libertarians, libertarian philosophy will never be taken seriously by a meaningful portion of the population."**

    So why are we even calling them "so-called libertarians," Beltway libertarians, regime libertarians, left libertarians, thick libertarians?

    Why are we even bringing in the term at all and to some extent legitimizing them? Libertine is the far superior and clear term.

    1. They call themselves libertarian; therefore, using the term "so-called" is my method of identifying them.

    2. BM, another way of identifying them would be "self-described libertarians".