Imagine a time when it all began
In the dying days of a war
A weapon that would settle the score
Whoever found it first would be sure to do
their worst
They always had before...
The big bang took and shook the world
Shot
down the rising sun
The
end was begun and it hit everyone
When
the chain reaction was done
It’s that time of year, for the 70th time. I am not sure I have anything new or creative
to add, yet I do not want to let this anniversary pass without some comment. I will keep this simple and offer links to
some previous posts of mine; click on if my introductory comments pique your
interest.
The two bombings, three days apart, were not and are not the
most egregious evils ever committed in war, only, perhaps, the most symbolic of
the species. The so-called Good
War had more than its share of terrorizing
civilian populations from the air, and well before August 1945.
It was not always a given – as it is today – that non-combatants
are fair game in war. The Middle Age
tradition in Europe almost completely differentiated between combatants and
non-combatants. This changed after the
time of the reformation – the so-called renaissance. However, eventually European tradition returned
by the eighteenth century toward an era of civilized
warfare. Napoleon began to change
this; Lincoln
demonstrated that it was never a consideration in his new world.
One of the foremost scholars on the topic of the nuclear
bombings, Gar Alperovitz, has examined both the decision to use the bomb and
the myth that was manufactured to legitimize the use; suffice it to say,
everything about the myth is a lie. His
book is entitled “The Decision
to Use the Atomic Bomb.” I have
offered an overview of his book here.
The bombing and aftermath of Hiroshima is captured in this
first person account offered by Dr. Shuntaro Hida. He was only 1.5 miles away when the bomb was
dropped. It is not an easy story to
read.
Before the myth-creation machine performed its national lobotomy,
there were many
voices publicly questioning and even condemning the act.
One of the myths is that Japan was ready to fight to the
bitter end; up to a million Americans would die to defeat Japan. Of course, Japan was ready to surrender;
documents discovered in 1979 – misfiled in Truman’s archive – present the fact
that Truman
knew, before he dropped the bombs, that Japan was prepared to surrender.
Even Herbert
Hoover documents the many approaches that Japan took toward surrender – for
several months before the bombs were dropped.
The myth is callously parroted today even by
those who appear to be otherwise jaded by the exercise of raw power.
We continue to live under this threat. The elimination of nuclear weapons – being the ultimate tool for violation of the non-aggression principle – should be of highest priority to libertarians. The idea of MAD is…mad.
We continue to live under this threat. The elimination of nuclear weapons – being the ultimate tool for violation of the non-aggression principle – should be of highest priority to libertarians. The idea of MAD is…mad.
Bio,
ReplyDeleteEven me ol' Dad, who was to the right of Attila, told me when I was a wee bairn that the dropping of those bombs, ESPECIALLY the Nagasaki bomb, was the single greatest war crime he could imagine.
After all, it took Hitler YEARS to kill six million.
Capn, are you sure about that, "...it took Hitler YEARS to kill six million..."
DeleteI used to believe that, for the first 50 years of my life. Then, I read Butz' 'The Greatest Hoax of the 20th Century,' 'The Rudolf Report,' 'The Leuchter Report,' and Irving's 'Nuremberg: The Last Battle' (all available free online in PDF) and changed my mind.
Why are you quibbling over numbers? The fact remains that Nazi Germany went to war not only against its neighbours, rightly or wrongly, but against portions of its own population for no reason at all.
DeleteI would say the notion that the Japanese were ready to surrender but conditionally is a modern myth concocted by weeaboos.
ReplyDeleteI haven't the time to dispute you regarding the bomb, except to say that Max Hastings and Antony Beevor, while agreeing with you that the Good War was not so good dispute your take on the bomb
ReplyDeleteThe so called respect for non combatants has a far more varied history than you assert. And Lincoln has really nothing to do with it, if we rode our view to include American Indians, the Taiping Rebellion, the wars of the British Empire during Lincoln time
And even during the Middle Ages we have the wars of the Black Prince, of the sacking and burnings of and by the several English , French and Italian kings or princes not to mention the wars in the rest of the world. The Crusades were not civilian friendly.
The ancient world in the West was not non combatant friendly. And those Muslim s and Mongols!!??
"I haven't the time to dispute you regarding the bomb..."
DeletePerhaps you might apply this more broadly?
I can only strike at a portion of your article
ReplyDeleteThis is merely a reply, not an in depth analysis as to why what you consider myths aren't
So I chose your assertion about the Middle Ages regarding noncombatants and combatants, widening the so called Middle Ages from say downtown Paris to the rest of that continent and it's neighbors
Your theory only holds in parts and not for humanitarian reasons, it is simply that some so called enlightened regimes, such as the Romans Republic and Empire needed live cities instead of dead ones, while the Muslims and Mongols had their own views, as in submit or die.
So Sherman s March was in line with the chevauche of the Black Prince or the Crusaders
Regarding Lincoln, we'll he was using tactics that Greene, Washington, Andrew Jackson used, not to mention the Apache, Cheyenne, Sioux and Iroquois
And you will recycle your column in 10 years, just as every one of you have since 1955
And in vain
Dick
DeleteYou sure have a lot of time for someone who doesn't have much time.
Enjoy your work. Two more contemporary journalist supporting the bombing of Hiroshima.
ReplyDeletehttp://mondoweiss.net/2015/08/celebrating-columnist-insinuates#comments