One of my regular listens is John Batchelor’s weekly interview with
Stephen F. Cohen; Cohen provides commentary regarding his view of the Russian
perspective on various geopolitical issues of the day. Of course, lately, this discussion has been focused
on Ukraine and Syria.
At the beginning of the interview from December 8, Cohen
commented on a flurry of antagonistic moves against Russia.
To set the stage, Paris was attacked on November 13. Shortly thereafter, French President Hollande
visited both Washington and Moscow, calling for a coalition to fight ISIS. Cohen then listed several events (taken by
Washington or its puppets / allies), each one of which can be clearly understood
to hinder any possibility of (or even desire for) a common fight against this
so-called greatest threat to mankind, ISIS.
Blow-out of Crimea’s
electricity
From the BBC, November 23:
Only essential services and
government offices are operating in Crimea after key electricity pylons
connected to the peninsula were knocked down in Ukraine.
Russia does not have a land border
with Crimea, which gets about 70% of its electricity from Ukraine.
Shoot down by Turkey
of Russian attack aircraft
From the BBC, regarding
the November 24 shoot-down:
Both Russia and Turkey say the
Russian Su-24, an all-weather attack aircraft, was shot down by Turkish F-16s
in the Turkey-Syria border area on 24 November.
NATO takes in
Montenegro
From NATO, December
2:
Montenegro aspires to join NATO and
the Allies have invited the country to begin accession talks to join the
Alliance.
These talks are the final step before approval of full
membership. Montenegro represents, of
course, a continuation of NATO’s advance to the east. Montenegro’s
military value?
The military currently maintains a
force of 1,950 active duty members.
An attack on Montenegro is an attack on all NATO
countries.
Biden goes to Kiev for
the fifth time, promising no rest until Crimea is restored
From The
New York Times, December 7:
Opening a two-day visit, Mr. Biden
told the Ukrainians that the United States still supported them in their
conflict with pro-Russian separatists, and accused President Vladimir V. Putin
of Russia of violating a cease-fire agreement reached in Minsk, Belarus. To
reinforce American backing, Mr. Biden promised another $190 million in aid.
“The United States stands firmly
with the people of Ukraine in the face of continued — and I emphasize continued
— aggression from Russia and Russian-backed separatists,” he said. “Minsk
cannot succeed if Russia does not fulfill its commitment and President Putin
fails to live up to the promises he has repeatedly made to my president, to you
and to the international community.”
Also on the visit, Biden
spoke of corruption in Ukraine (and forgive this digression from Cohen’s
list):
When Vice President Joseph R. Biden
Jr. traveled to Kiev, Ukraine, on Sunday for a series of meetings with the
country’s leaders, one of the issues on his agenda was to encourage a more
aggressive fight against Ukraine’s rampant corruption and stronger efforts to
rein in the power of its oligarchs.
But there is the issue of his son:
But the credibility of the vice
president’s anticorruption message may have been undermined by the association
of his son, Hunter Biden, with one of Ukraine’s largest natural gas companies,
Burisma Holdings, and with its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, who was Ukraine’s
ecology minister…
Zlochevsky had personal accounts frozen by the British, due
to concerns about corruption.
“Now you look at the Hunter Biden
situation, and on the one hand you can credit the father for sending the
anticorruption message,” [Edward C. Chow, who follows Ukrainian policy at the
Center for Strategic and International Studies] said. “But I think
unfortunately it sends the message that a lot of foreign countries want to
believe about America, that we are hypocritical about these issues.”
They “want to believe” it “about America” because it is true; the American
government is hypocritical about every
issue. I don’t credit Biden “for sending
the anti-corruption message”; I credit Biden for being able to pull-off such a
blatant hypocrisy without even blinking.
Back to Cohen’s timeline of events since Paris…
IMF suspends rules
about lending to countries in arrears, approving further loans to Ukraine
On December
8:
The International Monetary Fund on
Tuesday changed a rule that would have blocked its financial aid program to
Ukraine in the event the country defaulted on debt owed to Russia.
Until now, the IMF could not
provide financing to a member country that was in arrears to an official
creditor, such as a government.
And what does the Russian government think about this?
The move -- which drew an angry
response from Moscow -- comes as cash-short Ukraine faces a looming year-end
deadline to repay Russia for a $3 billion loan.
As perhaps could be said about every American action noted
by Cohen since the November 13 attacks in Paris and Hollande’s attempt to build
a coalition to include Russia in the fight against humanity’s (supposedly)
greatest threat.
Conclusion
Isaiah
57:20 But the wicked are like the tossing sea, which cannot rest, whose
waves cast up mire and mud.
22 Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water:
ReplyDelete23 Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.
America's attitude to Russia is defined by geopoplitics. America is terrified of the developing Russian-Chinese rapprochement which has the potential to dominate Eurasia and also to draw western Europe away from the alliance with America. America desperately needs regime change in Russia. America wants to see Putin replaced by a weak pro-western leader. The troubles in Ukraine are part of the American strategy to drive a wedge between western Europe and Russia.
ReplyDelete