I received a comment on my post “Borders
and Culture”:
Ted R. Weiland December 12, 2015 at
5:13 AM
Eliminate the genesis for Muslims
here in America and deport all practicing Muslims back to their home countries.
CLUE: There were no practicing
Muslims, no Mosques, no Sharia, and no Islamic terrorism in 17th-century
America whose governments of, by, and for God were established upon His unchanging
moral law, beginning with the First Commandment.
Biblical immigration and border
policy begins with the First Commandment, which, in turn, demands all
immigrants leave their gods, their culture, and their laws at the border or
suffer the consequences. No Muslim would ever agree to such law.
QUESTION: So, WHAT was it that
changed America from what it was in the 17th-century to what it is
now--arguably the most polytheistic nation to exist, including Islam?
ANSWER: The First Commandment was
replaced with the First Amendment's First Commandment-violating Free Exercise
Clause.
It's one thing to allow for
individual freedom of conscience and private choice of gods (something
impossible to legislate to begin with). It's another matter altogether for
government to enable any and all religions to proliferate through the land
evangelizing our posterity to their false gods.
For more, Google online Chapter 11
"Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism" of "Bible Law
vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
My reply:
bionic mosquito December 12, 2015
at 7:05 AM
“The First Commandment was replaced
with the First Amendment's First Commandment-violating Free Exercise Clause.”
And this was done, per your own
observation, before there were any practicing Muslims in America.
The problems in America are not due
to Muslim influence. The problems in America are fundamentally due to the
actions and beliefs of those who can loosely be labeled WASPs.
It is from this group that the
Constitution came; it is from this group that slavery was upheld; it is from
this group that Indians were slaughtered; it is from this group that hundreds
of thousands of Filipinos were killed; it is from this group that the Middle
East was carved into nonsensical borders; it is from this group that
carpet-bombed hundreds of thousands of non-combatants; it is from this group
that two Japanese cities were turned to ash; it is from this group that the two
main regional enemies of civilized Arabs/Muslims gain their support - Saudi
Arabia and Israel; it is from this group that – for at least three decades –
overt war has been perpetuated on Arabs and Muslims.
None of this will be solved by
“deport[ing] all practicing Muslims back to their home countries.” It is
attitudes such as this that convince many Muslims that they are once again
dealing with holy crusaders.
Who is Ted R. Weiland?
Ted R. Weiland pastors Christian
Covenant Fellowship in Scottsbluff, Nebraska, and is the evangelistic head of
Mission to Israel Ministries.
His “Mission to Israel” does not appear to be what you might
conclude on the surface. On his site, he
offers
a survey; really more like questions designed to lead the witness:
Did you know according to many
Jewish authorities, such as the 1980 Jewish Almanac, that most of today's Jews,
including those living in the Holy Land, are not even Israelites, but are
merely proselytes to Judaism?
Did you know that according to the
Jewish Encyclopedias and other Jewish authors, such as Arthur Koestler, most of
today's Jews are not descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but are, instead,
descendants of the Turkish, Mongolian, Khazar tribes that converted to Judaism
between the 7th and 9th centuries AD?
Did you know that in Revelation 2:9
and 3:9, God forewarned of impostors masquerading as Israelites?
Did you know that according to the
Bible, archaeology, history and even many Jews, it is the Anglo-Saxons,
Germanics, Scandinavians, Celts and kindred peoples who are descended from
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and are, therefore, Israelites by ancestral descent?
He then offers a book that apparently will demonstrate the
truth of these “facts.”
So, this Mission to Israel is a mission to descendants of
the Germanic tribes (including, of course, Americans), who are apparently
descendants of the Israel of the Bible.
What is Weiland’s mission to these
descendants?
We believe Yahweh’s laws are still
in effect under the New Covenant, not for justification, but for sanctification
and as a means for His people to govern society (Deuteronomy 4:5-8, 28:1-14,
Psalm 19:7-11).
And Yahweh’s
laws?
The law of YHWH is perfect,
converting the soul: the testimony of YHWH is sure, making wise the simple. The
statutes of YHWH are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of YHWH is
pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of YHWH is clean, enduring for ever: the
judgments of YHWH are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are
they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the
honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there
is great reward. (Psalm 19:7-11)
Behold, the days come, saith YHWH,
that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of
Judah. …this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel;
after those days, saith YHWH, I will put my law in their inward parts, and
write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
(Jeremiah 31:31-33)
According to Jeremiah (and the
author of Hebrews, who quoted this prophecy in Hebrews 8:8-10), the New
Covenant consists of Yahweh’s laws written on the hearts and minds of His
people,7 for the purpose of putting them into daily practice. It is impossible
to be a New Covenant Christian without pursuing Yahweh’s laws both individually
and societally.
Weiland points to the laws before Moses – Abrahamic laws,
God’s unchanging laws followed voluntarily.
It is these laws that must be restored, in America, today.
NB: I do not intend to get into the difference of Abrahamic
vs. Mosaic Law, nor the theology of Christ’s salvation as applicable to
either. Nor do I want to dive too deeply
into Weiland’s message. These are well
beyond the scope of this post and my interests.
Implementing God’s laws as given before Moses will solve all
of our ills, according to Weiland:
Unchecked crime
and immorality
Infanticide
Repressive
government and crooked politicians
Corrupt
juridical system
Corrupt
justices
Crooked lawyers
Rigged juries
Election fraud
Special
interest groups
Bureaucratic
entanglements
Licenses and
permits
Gun control
Prisons and
their exorbitant costs and myriad problems
A fraudulent
economic and banking system
The Federal
Reserve
The Internal
Revenue Service
Oppressive
taxation
Eminent domain
Socialistic
welfare system
Unethical
insurance system
Unlawful
immigration
Multiculturalism, pluralism, and polytheism
This seems a stretch.
God’s laws as revealed to Abraham didn’t take root the last time – and
this was with a much smaller community and with the reality of escape from
bondage in Egypt. Human nature has not
changed so much since then, has it?
The good news for some, at least, is you don’t have to
comply; compliance is voluntary for those under the God’s grace through Jesus:
The major difference between the
Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants was voluntary versus compulsory compliance. Paul
wrote to the Galatian Christians that the law – the Mosaic Covenant – was added because of Israel’s transgressions.
What about those not under God’s grace? I need look no further than Weiland’s comment
to my earlier post, noted above: he wants them deported.
My theology? If God
wants me to stone prostitutes or sacrifice a lamb, He will have to tell me
Himself when I see Him. If He wants me
to deport Muslims – as Weiland suggests – I guess I will hear about it in my
next life.
Further, if Anglo-Saxons are the Jews of God, then it is
self-evident that geography isn’t sacred; therefore, there is nothing sacred
about this land mass that sits in the northern hemisphere between two vast
oceans. So who gets to deport whom?
Consistent with my earlier posts on borders, culture, etc.,
those who believe as Weiland does should be free to form such a community –
unbound by any laws to the contrary. If
they don’t want Muslims in, don’t let them in.
This isn’t for me. In
this life, God calls me to peace. I hope
this is sufficient.
I have had some conversation with this "pastor" myself a few times.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I get from him is that he basically is calling for an American Theocracy, much more extreme than even some of the early Puritan colonies.
He claims that the early Founders would have never allowed muslims in America, but even as early as John Locke in his "A Letter Concerning Toleration", and later with Jefferson quoting Locke, they absolutely said that the same protections for the Christian in America applied to the Muslim and Jew.
And there is a pretty good case to be made that a lot of African slaves in America were in fact Muslim.
This guy talks a lot, appeals to the hatred of misguided conservative "christians", but he fails or refuses to back up his claims with historical evidence, and definitely fails in his theology.
Scripture is clear on how the Believer is suppose to treat the "sojourner" and the traveler. And I have not read anywhere that there is a litmus test before this command is adhered to.
And I would fear his imposed Theocracy just as much as I would an imposed Muslim State.