This treatise has been praised and
attacked at different times in different places contrary to my thoughts and
anticipations.
On
Law and Power, Johannes Althusius
In this extract from Althusius’ work, the editors of this
book have captured the detailed definitions of Althusius’ construct – helping to
clarify his meaning in his writing. On the
one hand, I feel as if I should have read these definitions before I started
exploring Althusius; on the other, I think it has been helpful that I have read
of Althusius through the eyes of people who have already done this heavy
lifting as at times his writing is confusing to me.
With that said, I think a handful of these definitions are
worth understanding both in the context of his work and perhaps for the
continuing purposes at this blog.
What Law Is – in my opinion, law is this: something that is
established after coming into being because of an action in a human affair, or
because of some individual, for the necessity, benefit, and direction of this
life.
The Structure of Law – The structure of law is twofold – natural or
common law and civil or individual law…
This statement from Althusius offers an example of why he is
somewhat confusing to read directly – he uses as interchangeable natural and
common, civil and individual. For
example, later in this listing he will offer seven different terms for natural law…and common law is not one of these in this subsequent list!
The Nature of Natural Law – A law is natural and common if common
right reason produces it for common necessity and welfare of human social life
in general. Therefore, it is called
natural law.
Common Law – Therefore, common law is that which has been inscribed
on human hearts by nature or by God from birth…
The civil or individual law must be deduced from Natural
Law, yet it must be unique to the issues of the situation and location. For this reason, it is changeable. Althusius offers two examples of this
individual law, presumably from his own experience: the prohibition of gifts
between spouses, and the prohibition of granting a loan to a son when the son
is still under parental authority.
Neither violates the Natural Law, yet apparently there was some cause to
enact these as civil / individual laws.
Althusius then offers duties arising from Natural Law; these
duties are twofold: first to ourselves, and second to others (including God). With respect to ourselves, the duties are
self-defense, self-preservation (to include property), and self-propagation
(including the proper rearing of children).
Regarding our duties to others, these are three-fold: for our duties to
God, look to the first table of the Decalogue; for our duties to others, look
to the second; live the Golden Rule.
What Public Power Is – Public power is what has been granted to
someone from the body of an association, with a territory, for the purpose of
caring for and administering the business, affairs, and individuals of the
associated body.
Keeping in mind the nature of the political relationships as
we have examined previously – both subsidiarity and the ability to secede –
this is a reasonable definition. This Civil Administration is responsible for administering
the second table of the Decalogue; the Ecclesiastic Administration is
responsible for administering the first.
Conclusion
I continue to find that Althusius did the best he could with
the material available after the Reformation.
In many ways he has tried to capture the decentralization and
subsidiarity of medieval Europe without the benefit of an independent Church,
and without the authority such an independent Church held.
No comments:
Post a Comment