According to Cato:
The Milton Friedman Prize for
Advancing Liberty, named in honor of perhaps the greatest champion of liberty
in the 20th century, is presented every other year to an individual who has
made a significant contribution to advance human freedom.
Friedman was widely regarded as the
leader of the Chicago School of monetary economics, which stresses the
importance of the quantity of money as an instrument of government policy and
as a determinant of business cycles and inflation.
I will avoid the secondary shortcomings when it
comes to marrying the words “Friedman” and “liberty.” Anyone who advocates government control and
central planning of money (the single most important commodity) and credit (the
single most important price) cannot possibly serve to “advance human freedom.”
Cato writes “an instrument of government policy” without a
blink. That instrument is one of two most important means of control that
a government has over its people (the other being the public funding of
education, which Friedman also supported via his voucher scheme).
Perhaps the greatest champion of liberty in the 20th
century was a founding member of Cato. It
turned out that Cato didn’t really want to associate with any champions of
liberty. Here
is what he had to say about Friedman.
Support for central planning and control of the single most
important commodity in the market – utilized as one side of every single
transaction in a division-of-labor economy.
This doesn’t sound much like “liberty,” unless you are “an instrument
of government policy” Cato.
I prefer Mises to his students, Rothbard and Hayek. I don't agree with Rothbard's anarchism and Hayek's welfare state. Ayn Rand and Ron Paul might be the only other people worthy of consideration.
ReplyDelete