From Lew
Rockwell:
“Trump Will Be President” says one
of my respected political sages. “Of course, Trump will win the nomination.
That has been clear for some time. But
now I am saying he will be the next president.
After citing some concerning positions held by The Donald, the political sage offers
(emphasis added):
“There is only one unalloyed happy
note. Trump will rein in the empire. Even
the power elite realize the empire has gotten out of hand. Under Trump, who
is, after all, not a neocon, there will be fewer wars, maybe no US wars. Call
his governing philosophy ‘antiwar fascism’.”
Despite the very regular setbacks, I have always tried to
hold on to my view that the elite – the string pullers above the visible
players – are as concerned about an out-of-control military empire as many of
us are. Few will survive the next
nuclear war, and those who do will not enjoy the lifestyle of several
generations in the bunker (well, unless they have secretly invented this).
Obama did not come out of nowhere eight years ago by happenstance. Either Hillary or McCain were perfectly fine
tools. Yet, the (relatively) peaceful
candidate was selected for the voters. Even
more than a year ago, I felt that this upcoming election would give us some
clues about the desires of the elite:
Another clue will be offered by the
next US presidential election; will a war hawk be chosen (there are many
candidates) after the relative respite of Obama, or will it be one with a
slightly more passive, yet acceptable tone?
At the time of this earlier post, and despite his already
very visible shortcomings to most of the libertarian supporters of his father,
I felt that Rand
Paul could be that candidate –
the one to move US foreign and military policy toward a less interventionist
stance.
Which brings me to the title of this post. I have written very little about Rand in the
last two years – less than ten posts labeled as such; he has become just
another politician, not a topic that regularly draws my curiosity. If not for his father, I would have never
even noticed him (how many posts have I written on Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio…).
Most recently I commented on his
opposition to the Iran nuclear deal – the event that seems to finally have
awakened Justin Raimondo (although I cannot say this condition is permanent);
before that, I offered a
RIP for his candidacy. For me, his
colors began to show more
than three years ago.
Not counting those whose personal dalliances were made an
issue for some political take-down reason, it is difficult for me to recall any
single political player who so completely and absolutely blew it. Rand had the most enthusiastic political base
in the country behind him. Rand had the
political winds on his side – both from above (the elite) and below (the
people). He may never have become
president if he had stuck to his father’s knitting, but all signs were pointing
to the continued growth of both of these constituencies.
In every single step Rand blew it (and continues to blow it,
although it may not matter even in the long run as he may have ruined his ability to re-energize his father’s
base forever). He completely misread the
global situation; he completely misread domestic politics; most importantly –
and going back to the note from Lew Rockwell – he completely misread the
concerns of the power elite.
He was playing yesterday’s game with players who don’t matter. Even if getting elected president was more
important to Rand than anything approaching a consistent philosophical
platform, he couldn’t have done worse.
With all of this said, I do not claim to know that Trump
will win; frankly, I haven’t followed him closely enough to make much of a
comment about his views on foreign policy and US military adventurism. But I doubt Lew would have posted the subject
item from someone who was less than credible in analyzing and understanding the
political scene.
Which reminds me, once again, of the picture I will forever
have about Rand (from an above-referenced post):
The best picture I have is from
Marlon Brando, On the Waterfront
You don't
understand, I could have had class!
I could have
been a contender.
I could have
been somebody.
Instead of a
bum...
...which is
what I am. Let's face it.
Never in the field of political conflict was so little
accomplished by one who had been given so much.
*HT Winston
Nice piece.........Lew needs to go back and read his lysander Spooner
ReplyDeleteOr Carlin
https://youtu.be/qxsQ7jJJcEA
"Lew needs to go back and read his lysander Spooner Or Carlin."
DeleteWhy does Lew need go back and read their writings?
I am not so sure the Iran deal is good for peace. I think it will used to buy time while Syria is dealt with. In the mean tome it will allow inspectors to gain intelligence on Iranian capabilities. Finally, we will find "violations" that will be used to justify military action while allowing us to claim we gave our best effort for peace. Finally, Netanyahu will get an extra $2 billion a year.
ReplyDeleteIt makes sense that even the string-pulling elite are getting nervous about the consequences of the American military rampaging all over the globe. The long term horrors of a nuclear war are probably not the elite's only nightmare.
ReplyDeleteJust as ISIS, a creation of the American government, has gotten uppity and broken free of its handlers, the U.S. military may likewise do so and endanger the power and even the lives of the string-pullers. What is to prevent our puppet President or even some rogue general from ordering late night military raids on the homes of major banksters? Of what use is one's immense power and wealth with a gun in one's face? Will millions of demonstrators demand the banksters be released from prison?
One wonders why Rand Paul threw away his father's huge and growing libertarian following in order to kiss up to the Republican leadership. As I recall, there was evidence eight years ago and much more so four years ago that energetic Ron Paul enthusiasts were infiltrating the Republican Party at the local grassroots level. In the meantime, the aging Republican elite has gotten eight years older and that much closer to loss of power.
There was no reason for Rand to compromise libertarian principles. He had demographics on his side and gained absolutely nothing from doing so. All he had to do to inherit his father's growing following was to adopt Ron's uncompromising libertarian posture. As BM pointed out, Rand could have been somebody. He could have been a contender. But he decided instead that it was more important to get along with losers.