A
History of Medieval Europe, RHC Davis
As noted, the fall of Rome was not sudden, but long
and slow – with change only somewhat noticeable to those living through the
time:
Because the barbarian invasions
were not sudden but gradual, it was possible for many Roman citizens to ignore
their significance. Though they bewailed
the fact that the times were not as good as they once had been, they tried to
go on living as if nothing had changed.
Davis offers three reactions to this reality – as noted by Salvian, the barbarians were
no longer at the gates but within them. First,
that of St.
Augustine, who concluded that Rome was sacked because God willed it. While saddened by this realization, he
determined that Rome was not a true state because it was not founded on
justice: “Set aside justice, then, and what are kingdoms but great bands of
brigands?”
Next, Davis offers Theodoric the
Ostragoth – as an example of collaboration and cooperation. The Italians had to admit that military power
passed to the barbarians; Theodoric, now ruling Rome, was viewed as a “good”
barbarian.
Finally, Justinian, for whom the title of this post is
taken. Justinian was not satisfied to
allow Rome to die a long, slow death. He
felt it his calling to fight back, to reconquer what was lost. He was the last Latin speaking emperor, and
the last who framed his policies with a view toward Latin rather than Greek
interests.
Fifty years since Italy was taken, one-hundred years since
Africa; Justinian saw it as his duty to take it all back. The Vandals, Visigoths, Franks, and Ostrogoths
had carved up the empire of the west.
Fortunately for Justinian, they had their quarrels with each other at
the same time.
Eventually, having seemingly brought Africa and Italy back
into the fold, he turned his attention to the law. Roman law had become so vast and bulky that
it had become impossible to establish what, in fact, was good law. Justinian re-codified the law: Corpus Juris Civilis,
according to Davis “an achievement to make any emperor famous.”
Additionally, Justinian built fortresses and cathedrals –
Hagia Sophia in Constantinople being perhaps the most famous. But by the time the church of San Vitale was
consecrated in 547, the Goths were once again in possession of much of Italy. To the extent there was any peace, it was a
peace brought about by exhaustion.
Justinian thought he could bring harmony within the Empire
and the Church through force and legislation; he discovered soon enough his
mistake. He only proved that the empire
was truly lost – he was paying barbarian troops to fight the Roman fight. Who were the Romans? By this point, the answer to this question wasn’t
clear. The eastern empire was Greek, the
western mostly barbarian or mixed.
The cost of his re-conquest was enormous – vast armies, many
mercenaries, requiring significant taxes to pay them. Land taxes requiring neighbors of abandoned
properties to pay the tax. War upon war,
on three fronts as necessary.
So far as Italy was concerned, it
was Justinian’s wars that marked the beginning of the ‘Dark Ages’. In reconquering the West, Justinian had in
fact destroyed it; of him it could be said more truly than of any other
emperor, that ‘he made a desert and called it peace.’
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI find myself stumped by your quote attributed to St. Augustine in your article entitled "He Made a Desert and Called it Peace:"
“Set aside justice, the, and what are kingdoms but great bands of brigands?”
I have a large collection of aphorisms and this is certainly one worth keeping; so "the" what? <8~)
jeb
Btw, I consider you to be among the better contributors to Lew Rockwell's daily, particularly regarding topics and objectivity.
should have been "then." I have corrected it, and thank you for the catch.
Delete