This is a story about the sacrament of voting; it is a story
about one man challenging this sacrament.
It will help if you are already familiar with the story of the
intersection of baseball, steroids, and voting for the Hall of Fame. For me to properly explain these issues would
take the writing of far more words than I care to write. However, if you are not familiar with the
issues, trust me: the intersection of these three topics is considered as
hallowed and is covered in as much religiosity in the United States as is the
subject of the political vote.
In other words, a lot of noise about something that is absolutely
meaningless.
Dan Le
Batard is a TV and radio host:
Dan Le Batard (born December 16,
1968) is a Cuban-American newspaper sportswriter, radio host, and television
reporter based out of Miami, Florida…. Since 2004, he has also hosted his own
radio show, The Dan Le Batard Show with
Stugotz, on ESPN Radio. He is a frequent contributor to several ESPN
programs, serving as a regular replacement host for Pardon the Interruption when one of the regular hosts is out. In
2011, he began hosting the ESPN2 show Dan
Le Batard is Highly Questionable with his father, Gonzalo Le Batard.
What is ESPN?:
ESPN (originally an abbreviation
for Entertainment and Sports Programming Network) is a U.S.-based global cable
and satellite television channel, that is owned as a joint venture between The
Walt Disney Company (which operates the network, through its 80% ownership
interest) and Hearst Corporation (which holds a 20% interest). The channel
focuses on sports-related programming including live and recorded event
telecasts, sports talk shows, and other original programming.
ESPN is as mainstream as mainstream gets when it comes to
sports programming.
Sportswriters have the vote for entry into the Baseball Hall
of Fame. Dan Le Batard has one of those
votes. Technically speaking, Le Batard
did not not vote – he merely found a creative way to expose
voting for the fraud that it is:
ESPN TV and radio host Dan Le
Batard said Wednesday that, as a form of protest, he had given his Baseball
Hall of Fame vote this year to the website Deadspin because he had become
disenchanted with the direction the voting process had taken in the steroid
era.
Steroids
and other performance enhancing drugs in baseball have been an emotional
topic in recent years for many who are close to the sport of baseball. One area of impact has been the consideration
for entry into Baseball’s
Hall of Fame of players who have been suspected of using steroids.
Deadspin, which had attempted to
buy a Hall of Fame vote but failed to do so, in turn allowed its readers to
choose the names to appear on Le Batard's ballot by voting "yes" or
"no." The 10 players with the highest voting percentages among
Deadspin readers would be picked on the ballot. Le Batard said on his radio
show Wednesday that he approved of the selections and submitted the ballot to
the Hall of Fame.
Le Batard has spoken often about the hypocrisy of keeping
players out of the Hall of Fame who have been connected to the use of
performance enhancing drugs. And there
is total hypocrisy – managers of those same players have been elected, the
Commissioner of Baseball throughout the steroid era is still commissioner.
Most laughably, writers who either covered up the use of
steroids or completely missed the story (either complicit or ignorant) are
the ones doing the voting!
In a piece posted on Deadspin, Le
Batard wrote, in part, "I hate all the moralizing we do in sports in
general, but I especially hate the hypocrisy in this. I always like a little
anarchy inside the cathedral we've made of sports."
In an interview on this topic, Le Batard noted how
supportive the general public was of his stance, and how absolutely critical
his peers were of his action. Something
interesting to think about.
Watch
this for an idea of the hysteria created in the mainstream due to Le Batard’s
action. One of the two talking heads is
about as anarchic as it gets in the sports-journalism world – yet you wouldn’t know
it from this reaction (and I bet you can’t even guess which one is the anarchic
one).
They get mad if you don’t vote – or even just expose the
vote for the sham that it is. It turns
out to be true, even in something as inconsequential as a baseball vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment