The
Birth of the West: Rome, Germany, France, and the Creation of Europe in the
Tenth Century, by Paul Collins
Tenth century Europe rode in on the collapse of
Charlemagne’s empire and rode out as foundational to what would be remembered by
many as the high point of the Middle Ages.
Per Paul Collins, it was this century that gave birth to what we know
(or once knew) as Europe. Western civilization – the combination of the
Frankish-Germanic people of northwestern Europe and Rome (or, perhaps, an
idealized version of Roman civilization) – was formed during this period.
I am about a third of the way through the book. This is a bit different than many of the
books I have read on the topic. It has
little focus on the law, and much focus on the violence, intrigue, invasions,
and forced conversions. Then again,
being only a third of the way through, I have not yet come to the “new Europe”
part.
Certainly Collins notes that power was diffused; the idea of
an absolute monarch didn’t enter Europe until the sixteenth century:
Instead, power in medieval society
was noncentralized, consensual, and consultative, even if the consent was
limited to the more powerful.
From my
earlier reading, while the more powerful had more liberty in their consent,
the less powerful were not left naked.
We are introduced to the raids and invasions of Vikings,
Magyars, Saracens – all made the easier due to almost continuous fighting among
and between brothers regarding inheritance and kingship.
While governance was decentralized, there was one thing
binding all of the people:
Latin, or Western, Christianity,
was the heart and soul of this new culture.
Catholicism totally permeated this society, and there was no distinction
whatsoever between church and state in our sense. They were simply two sides of the same coin.
While Catholicism permeated the society, this did not mean
that conflict was unknown between king and Pope. The Pope used the kings, the kings used the
Pope – partners when necessary, conniving when sensing weakness. In the earlier period, the kings were
generally ascendant; in the latter period, the papacy came to challenge this
dominance.
It was the Saxons – brought to Christendom in the most
violent manner by Charlemagne – that, perhaps, saved Christendom. Further, Poland and Hungary were eventually
converted; even the Vikings came to Christianity.
A few themes from the introduction…
The fallacy of
medieval: the Church was intolerant, stoning heretics and burning witches,
etc. Not so. We read of Archbishop Agobard of Lyon, in the
early ninth century, who came across a scene of villagers about to stone two
“sky sailors.”
The villagers faced a bad crop, and potentially starvation;
it was believed that such conditions were brought on by evil men who served the
devil. These “sky sailors” were,
instead, just unfortunate travelers, who happened by at just the wrong
time. It was Agobard – the Catholic
Archbishop – that saved these two unfortunates from the anger of the villagers.
The land:
everything was tied to the land – it wasn’t just the serfs. Massive dense forests: the nobles hunting for
sport, the peasants hunting for survival. Peasants holding traditional rights to hunt
(although the right to hunt “big game” was reserved to the nobles), gather
firewood and other products. Cleared forest
– some of known origin, others from pre-history. The idea of anyone having full and absolute property
rights was unknown.
Monasteries:
cleared land, provided rooms for travelers, maintained and developed tradition
and scholarship.
And now, a story: the Cadaver Synod.
The Cadaver Synod is the name
commonly given to the posthumous ecclesiastical trial of Pope Formosus, held in
the Basilica of St. John Lateran in Rome during January 897. The trial was
conducted by Pope Stephen VI (sometimes called Stephen VII), who was the
successor to Formosus' successor, Pope Boniface VI. Stephen accused Formosus of
perjury and of having acceded to the papacy illegally. At the end of the trial,
Formosus was pronounced guilty and his papacy retroactively declared null.
A picture is worth a few thousand words:
The poor deacon, standing next to the decaying body (dead
nine months earlier), was responsible to answer for Formosus. Talk about a lose-lose proposition! If he speaks too well, it would mean his disfigurement,
blinding, or even death. Speak too
poorly, and his own ordination at the hand of Formosus would be void.
What was Stephen’s beef?
It seems Stephen was ordained by Formosus to a position that would then
preclude him from ever rightly and subsequently becoming Pope. Having, despite this, ascended to the
position of Pope with the help of some local, powerful families, he now had to
declare Formosus’ ascendency to Pope as void and illegal – thereby voiding the
earlier ordination of Stephen to the lower position.
The Cadaver Synod marked the beginning of some of the worst civil
strife in Papal Rome, a condition that would continue for much of the
subsequent century.
Conclusion
The Cadaver Synod also marked the nadir of Europe after
Charlemagne. Collins offers the lack of
effective government after the fall of the Carolingian Empire as the cause of
the violence and turmoil. Of course, the
creation of Charlemagne’s empire was not conflict free. In order to make an omelet and all that.
It is notable that a prize
named after the warrior Charlemagne has been awarded annually since 1950 to
an individual who best exemplifies the European dream.
"The fallacy of medieval: the Church was intolerant, stoning heretics and burning witches, etc. Not so. "
ReplyDeleteI wonder if more of this happened under the "reformed" Protestant creeds. From my limited reading of the history of the Church, it seems like those serving it mostly burned or killed heretics after they proved themselves dangerous by robbing, raping, murdering, or taking over whole cities by force and subjugating the inhabitants to brutal communistic rule (Munster). There's a long list of dangerous nut jobs the Church had to deal with that tried (and often succeeded) to bamboozle masses of desperately poor folks and even armies of children in the name of God to serve their own sinful desires.
There's this argument against Islam that some conservatives (Gavin McInnes for one) have trotted out recently that goes something like this, "look, Christianity did some awful things in the past too, but we went through the Reformation, and now we've seen the error of our ways. Islam needs a reformation too, before it can be allowed into modern Western society." I'm no fan of Islam, and I'm not a Catholic, but the sheer ignorance of the statement is hard to miss.
Hmmm. Didn't the Salem witch trials occur under the direction of Protestant Puritans? Weren't there mass persecutions of Catholics in England in the 16th century? I'm sure there are some things the Church has done that I would disagree with from a libertarian and from a Christian perspective, but it doesn't seem like the Reformation cured Christianity of iniquity by any stretch of the imagination.
ATL
DeleteSee here, in the section entitled “Religious Tolerance.”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/04/liberal-society-hidden-in-dark-ages.html
Such things began to take root in the latter stages of the Middle Ages, but were opposite of the teaching and practices in the early and mid-stages. I do recall reading that witch trials and burnings were far more prevalent in Protestant communities and under Protestant influence.