The Libertarian
Forum, edited by Murray N. Rothbard from 1969 to 1984, had a small —
even tiny — circulation but it forged the intellectual edifice known as
libertarianism.
Month after month, the newsletter
thrilled, enlightened, shocked, and awed its subscribers. Everything was on the
table.
The Mises Institute has compiled and published every issue
of this obscure journal, in a two-volume book of 1200 pages in total. It offers a glimpse into the world as
Rothbard saw it – real time, during some of the most dramatic events in US
history.
Think about the Vietnam War and the protests (Kent State as
one example) and the last helicopter out of Saigon; Nixon closing the gold
window; Nixon resigning; raging inflation and high unemployment at the same
time – something that all mainstream economists thought an impossibility; the Iran
hostage crisis. I suspect each of these
is covered with gusto, and I look forward to the treatment.
The volumes also offer a glimpse into the libertarian world
in what must be described as its infancy.
Who were the early pioneers? What
gave any of them any hope?
At 1200 pages, this will be a long-term commitment on my
part. Unlike most of my book projects, I
will not run through this one uninterrupted; my intent is to touch on it from
time to time while continuing with the various other books and topics as I have
in the past.
Unless an author is specifically noted, my assumption is
that Rothbard wrote the referenced item.
I might be wrong, but my guess is not very often. And with this, I will begin with the
introductory issue, dated March 1, 1969:
Why The Libertarian?
The libertarian movement is growing
at a remarkable pace throughout the country.
Yet the organizational forms, the means of communication, among
libertarians are not only miniscule, but actually suffered a considerable blow
during 1968.
It remains remarkable to me that those few libertarians that
could fit in a phone booth could even find each other before the internet. Heck, it is remarkable to me that I found
anything “libertarian” before the internet.
Talk about Isaiah’s Job and
preaching to the remnant! Making the
commitment to write a twice-monthly newsletter during a time when Rothbard
probably knew every “libertarian” personally, and could count them on one hand –
I cannot describe this in any way other than a huge leap of faith.
Rothbard goes on to list some of the early institutions that
“suffered a considerable blow”:
Freedom School-Ramparts
College: was a libertarian educational institution established by Robert
LeFevre in Colorado, United States in 1956. The college was an unaccredited
four-year school for classical liberals and individualist anarchists. Teachers
at the college included Butler Shaffer and Sy Leon, who ran the college after
it moved to Southern California in 1966.
Forgive the length of this next one; the list of names is
worth review:
New Individualist
Review: Ralph Raico, editor. Initially
sponsored by the University of Chicago Chapter of the Intercollegiate Society
of Individualists, the New Individualist Review was more than the usual “campus
magazine.” It declared itself “founded in a commitment to human liberty.”
Between 1961 and 1968, seventeen issues were published which attracted a
national audience of readers. Its contributors spanned the libertarian-conservative
spectrum, from F. A. Hayek and Ludwig von Mises to Richard M. Weaver and
William F. Buckley, Jr. The associate editors were John P. McCarthy, Robert
Schuettinger, and John Weicher. The book review editor was Ronald Hamowy. Other
authors included Milton Friedman, Murray N. Rothbard, F.A. Hayek, Russell Kirk,
Eugene Miller, Wilhelm Roepke, Harry Elmer Barnes, Sam Peltzman, George
Stigler, Benjamin Rogge, Ludwig von Mises, Bruno Leoni, Israel Kirzner, Richard
Weaver, Yale Brozen, Gordon Tullock, Warren Nutter, W.H. Hutt, E.G. West, Henry
Hazlitt, Arthur A. Ekirch, Ljubo Sirc, and Armen Alcjian.
He also lists Pine Tree Press, but I find nothing on line on
this entity.
Regarding the then-new Nixon administration, Rothbard notes
that only perhaps 90 of the top jobs have been filled out of the thousands available:
How much clearer can it be that the
much vaunted free elections in the United States are a sham and a fraud,
designed to lull the public into believing that their voices really count?
It certainly was clear to clear thinkers such as
Rothbard. I suspect that the recent
election of Trump is making it clear to the tens of millions of those who voted
for him; what Rothbard saw almost 50 years ago may be finally entering a
broader consciousness.
Next comes an idea of a “People’s Court,” proposed by Gerald
Gottlieb in the January 1969 issue of The
Center Magazine. Given the failings
of institutions such as the World Court, the idea is for private citizens to
create a court “independent of nations and able to render judgement upon those
who misuse sovereign power.”
Rothbard asks: How would such a body enforce its
jurisdiction and decisions? He points to
successes of the Bertrand Russell War Crimes Tribunal in arousing European
sentiment against the Vietnam War and other similar private efforts.
The last report in this edition regards the city of San
Francisco and a new law that prohibits sitting on the sidewalk. Rothbard’s complaint sounds almost quaint given
how far and how quickly the totalitarian American state has grown:
…we must note one more step on the
road to a totalitarian America.
Conclusion
Murray, one can only wonder what you have been writing
regarding this totalitarian America since September 11, 2001.
One must ask "why is Murray Rothbard now hated by a large segment of libertarians?". Among a certain segment (and let's face it, the most numerous and monied segment) of libertarians, Rothbard is virtually persona non grata. To them mentioning Rothbard is like farting at a fancy dinner party.
ReplyDelete"and let's face it, the most numerous and monied segment"
ReplyDeleteThe People's Court(where have we heard this before?)
This would be my primary concern about a private court. If in libertarianism you vote with your dollar, I could concievably be left out for being less monied.
Josh1476,
DeleteIt could be a lot worse than that. Imagine a single owner of a given geographical area. Let's say Rhode Island. What is the difference between living under the rules of the state and this owner? Well, the difference is that the owner is completely unrestricted in his sovereignty. You can leave and that's it.
Good luck on leaving if the seas and airspace above are owned by someone like George Soros. Like the Hotel California, you can check in but never leave.
"Pine Tree Press" produces 39,000,000 results on Google. What search engine couldn't find it?
ReplyDeleteYou must be kidding. 39 million links to an obscure libertarian press? You believe this?
DeleteDid you even check any of the links for relevance?
I find a mention of it on the Wikipedia page of Robert Lefebvre, but no meaningful description.
Thirty nine million relevant hits? That's a laugher.
"He also lists Pine Tree Press, but I find nothing on line on this entity." Where does it say relevant? I read books published by Pine Tree Press when I was a volunteer in the Colorado Libertarian Party office in Denver. I might even have some of them in my book horde. If it is in my memory, it is in someone else's, although real libertarians are getting as hard to find as real representatives.
DeleteI was a subscriber to the Libertarian Forum. Sometime in the early 70s I was at Rothbard's Apt. And asked if he authored the unsigned articles and he said yes.
ReplyDeleteThe Pine Tree Press was the publisher that gave us 1960s libertarians a 1966 edition of Lysander Spooner's NO TREASON; published with Spooner's "Letter to Thomas F. Bayard" (both reprinted from Rampart Journal). I still have my treasured copy. It had an introduction by James J. Martin. The precise legal relationship between it, Rampart College, and Robert Lefevre is not clear, but it would not be far wrong to say that it was probably created as an imprint of Rampart College.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this background, Ronald.
DeleteLoompanics Unlimited did the same thing with a large number of low-demand or "undesirable" books, many of which became unavailable after they closed down after receiving no acceptable purchase offers. My personal favorite, Vonulife, moved to Delta Press.
ReplyDeleteOh, it is great to go through the whole archive of the Forum, I'm doing the same slowly but surely.
ReplyDeleteI also archived the whole Rothbard-Rockwell Report with the same intention:
https://ellenpropaganda.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/The%20Complete%20Rothbard-Rockwell%20Report.pdf