It is well known, the bullet that killed crown prince Franz
Ferdinand of Austria. There is a second,
equally important bullet that drove – or in this case, kept clear – Europe’s
drive toward suicidal war.
The
Lost History of 1914: How the Great War Was Not Inevitable, by Jack Beatty.
The bullet was fired by Henriette Caillaux, killing Gaston
Calmette, the editor of Le Figaro. She believed he was about to expose secrets
about her marriage. Apparently her
husband was a man about town…and these secrets might have been equally
embarrassing to her.
Except for the bark of her Browning, Henriette’s husband Joseph
Caillaux would have been France’s premier in July 1914.
Caillaux was known for easing tensions in Europe, and
certainly with Germany. He was known for
not favoring France’s military alliance with Russia. He was not from Alsace-Lorraine, and
therefore did not feel the same pull toward restoring these lands, lost to
Germany some forty years earlier.
The shot rang out on March 16, 1914, just weeks before the
election; the trial ended just days before the beginning of the war. In the months before the shot, Caillaux was
attacked regularly – over 110 articles, cartoon, and the like – on the pages of
Le Figaro. In the elite circles of France, the attacks
were a success; with the working class, not so much. He was considered a thief for abusing his
power and finance minister and a traitor for having the audacity to pursue
secret negotiations with Germany during an earlier crisis regarding Morocco.
The crisis was no small affair, and no isolated
incident. The Europeans were in the
midst of carving up much of Africa and the Middle East. The treatment of the native populations was
brutal; they died by the tens of millions.
Voice to such atrocities was given by a Moroccan chief, prior to
attacking a French garrison:
Know that, since your arrival in
the Sahara, you have badly treated weak Muslims….You have made our country
suffer intense harm.
This message was delivered before 15,000 Muslim men attacked
a garrison of 75 French men…oh, armed with two 80 mm cannon. Wave after wave, the Muslims attacked. The slaughter was immense. There was no report of French loss of life.
Germany was late to the party, nevertheless by this time
rather engaged; meanwhile, the French violated or ignored previous treaties
that were to have recognized German claims to the African coast. Into this mess stepped Caillaux, who found a
way to compromise in a manner satisfactory to all; a manner that allowed all to
save face.
He would have been premier in July 1914.
Conclusion
Henriette was found not guilty; a crime of passion, and a
bullet fired not meant to kill.
Before the trial, Raymond Poincaré conceded that if the
verdict was “not guilty,” he would have no choice but to name Caillaux the
premier. However, by the time the trial
ended and the verdict reached, Europe was on the brink of war. It would not do to have a premier who desired
peace with Germany and no military alliance with Russia.
Last night I finished reading your Time Line to War(to 1939). It is a great work of summarizing events. I would like to suggest that in your next update the joint German-Turkish Berlin-Baghdad railway be included as well as the Balfour Declaration. Then I came upon your current post--Prelude to the Great War:France. It adds more to the understanding of WW I as a great tragedy for the human family.
ReplyDeleteYour writing should be made required reading in every high school world history class. It would be a great replacement for all the fluff that kids are required to read.
Thank you for the kind and encouraging comments.
DeleteI will incorporate the Berlin-Baghdad Railway in the next edition.
As for the Balfour Declaration, I mention this on 2 November, 1917. If you feel it should be developed further in the timeline, let me know.