A few more comments on this topic.
First, a couple of comments from the original post:
Alec April 5, 2016 at 11:20 AM
Only white countries are supposed to be open borders. But everyone else doesn't have to. How convenient. [Jews] have WAY too much influence here out of all proportion to their numbers.
“WAY” is not a very scientific term, although I agree that relative to the numbers Jews do have significant influence “here.”
What should be done about this? Is “influence” a crime? Is there some share of influence that becomes too much influence?
Mark Belk April 5, 2016 at 1:53 PM
The NAACP was a Jewish project whose presidents were jews all the way up until 1978. Remember, jews invented communism, (Marx and Engles), and the communists said they would destroy us from within.
Engels was not Jewish, unless I am missing something. As an aside, Engels was not an afterthought to Marx, but a significant contributor and financier:
In 1848 he co-authored The Communist Manifesto with Karl Marx, though he also authored and co-authored (primarily with Marx) many other works, and later he supported Marx financially to do research and write Das Kapital. After Marx's death, Engels edited the second and third volumes. Additionally, Engels organised Marx's notes on the "Theories of Surplus Value," which he later published as the "fourth volume" of Capital.
In any case, these are ideas. Ideas require human beings for implementation. Who is doing the implementation?
Now to comments from the more recent post:
UnhappyConservative April 5, 2016 at 11:27 AM
The mistake I believe you gents are making is this: you are unwilling to get into the weeds of the reality of human behavior and are stuck on an idealized view of human behavior (rational man).
Not me. Just looking to a different source for the majority (or plurality) of the problem.
If we know a priori what to expect from certain classes of people then we are much better equipped to understand what is going on around us.
This is a loaded sentence.
What do you suggest we do with this understanding? What shall be done with these “certain classes”? How certain can we be a priori? What action should be taken to counter what is essentially a very effective organizational campaign?
This presupposes an unfettered freewill and doesn't take into account arguments from biological determinism.
I presuppose no such thing. No human has an “unfettered freewill.” No one. We all are born with baggage and we gain more daily. The question is: what do you suggest we do with those whose fettered and biologically determined will is not to your liking?
UnhappyConservative April 4, 2016 at 3:43 PM
However, without Marx there would be no Mao.
I haven’t studied this enough to say, but it seems to me a strongman can always find a way in any society that is not generally favorable to individual liberty.
If I could summarize my view crudely, it is this: the West had AIDS and the Jews are a bad cold.
Now we are getting somewhere – hence the modification in the title to this post. Only I might modify your statement somewhat…actually, I won’t because every way I try to write it is even more crude. Let’s just say the WASP politicians and power brokers of the West can’t keep it in their pants; Jews or Zionists are not the only object of their affections.
Most important to my viewpoint: just keep in mind whose “it” it is, and whose pants “it” doesn’t stay in.
Matt@Occidentalism.org April 4, 2016 at 8:08 PM
I don't know how to question or deal with it. You made a very broad assertion involving wonkish geo-political strategy, in two very short paragraphs.
Matt, you are a very astute and intelligent commenter. My point cannot be missed on you. “Israel” or “Jews” does not explain virtually every war of the West for the last 100 years. The answer lies elsewhere, I conclude. I draw on Mackinder, and have written a few posts about this; this theory holds together better than any other (Jews, oil, natural resources, democracy, communism, terrorism, dominoes falling, whatever).
Almost all US foreign policy results from domestic considerations, not geopolitical strategy, in my opinion.
I am curious as to what you mean by this.
UnhappyConservative April 5, 2016 at 11:49 AM
…is [Zionism] bad for the U.S and Europe?
Yes, like unprotected sex with a partner of well-earned disrepute. The problem is that many powerful WASPs in the US cannot keep it in their pants. It is the WASPs choosing this lifestyle and taking actions to advance it.
…I am sure you have some awareness of a how taboo this subject is.
Certainly. Yet, per my earlier reply to you, I am inherently cautious to write in terms of “groups,” for personal reasons perhaps more than libertarian / individualistic reasons (or maybe one reason supports the other).