I have several recent items rolling around in my head. I don’t believe any of these is worthy of a
post on its own, yet they are clogging my mind from focusing on much else. As I have done in the past when I have come
to such a situation, they all come to you as one.
Us or Them
According to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, This
is a global stock market rout worth celebrating: Cheap oil is a tax cut for
consumers, a healthy haircut for sovereign wealth funds, and a shot in the arm
for the world economy.
He suggests that the real economy is doing reasonably well:
World growth has been drearily
stable for years, shuffling along at 3.4pc in 2012, 3.3pc in 2013, and 3.4pc in
2014, and 3.1pc in 2015. The International Monetary Fund expects 3.4pc this
year.
The latest "GDPNow"
tracker from the Atlanta Federal Reserve suggests that US growth is running at
2.5pc in the first quarter, smack in line with a typical late-cycle expansion
in a mature economy.
I will take him at his word, and not interject personal
opinion in this. After all, if the Fed didn’t
think the economy was doing reasonably well, why all the jabber-jabber
regarding a rate hike over the last year or more, ultimately culminating with a
0.25% increase?
The Fed’s actions have only done damage to the markets:
The MSCI index of world equities
has fallen almost 20pc since its all-time high in May of 2015, implying a $14
trillion loss of paper wealth.
Saudi Arabia's net holdings of
overseas securities fell by $23bn in the single month of December. Fitch
Ratings expects Abu Dhabi to drain its fund (ADIA) by $27bn this year. The
Norwegians began dipping into their $820bn fund in October.
A clutch of distressed sellers are
having to liquidate stocks, bonds, and property for month after month on a
grand scale.
So, us it us or them?
Will the Fed continue to (attempt to) slowly move rates toward something
approaching normal, or will they go back and provide liquidity to the markets?
Shave and a Haircut…
Working through my Ambrose to-do list...German
'bail-in' plan for government bonds risks blowing up the euro:
A new German plan to impose
"haircuts" on holders of eurozone sovereign debt risks igniting an
unstoppable European bond crisis and could force Italy and Spain to restore
their own currencies, a top adviser to the German government has warned.
“It is the fastest way to break up
the eurozone,” said Professor Peter Bofinger, one of the five "Wise
Men" on the German Council of Economic Advisers.
Under the scheme, bondholders would
suffer losses in any future sovereign debt crisis before there can be any
rescue by the eurozone bail-out fund (ESM).
"A speculative attack could
come very fast.”
As bondholders know that many governments are bankrupt
except for central bank backing, I suspect a speculative attack would come
immediately.
…the new plan empowers private
investors to act as judge and jury on the solvency of states. "We can't
allow a regime where markets are masters of governments,” [Bofinger] said.
Markets will win. They
have been winning the war from time immemorial.
This has been especially visible in the last eight years. It is obvious to all – even the most die-hard
Keynesian central planner – that central planning of money, like central
planning everywhere, is a failure.
And if the Euro isn’t
Enough Reason to Tear Europe Apart
Turkey apparently isn’t playing nice when it comes to
dealing with the refugee crisis:
One thing, though, that [António
Rocha of the Portuguese coast guard] and his shipmates haven't yet seen is a
boat being turned back by the Turkish coast guard. "Sometimes they motor
around the refugee rafts and tell them they should turn around," says the
Greek liaison officer onboard the Tejo.
"But when nothing happens, the Turkish boats just leave."
Merkel is not finding a willing partner in Turkey:
Since October, she has negotiated
with the Turkish government six times, most recently on Monday. But there is
little indicating that success is imminent.
"Forget it," Turkish EU
Ambassador Selim Yenel told the Guardian
this week when asked about Merkel's refugee plan. "It's unacceptable and
it's not feasible."
She doesn’t even have support through much of Europe (to say
nothing of within Germany):
Macedonia is not a member of the
EU, but Hungary and other countries have already sent 80 officials to the
country to assist with closing the border. At a meeting of the Visegrád Group
-- which includes Eastern European EU members -- planned for next Monday,
Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia are to discuss ways in which
the Balkan route can be closed off for good.
This doesn’t sound “open.”
That Didn’t Take Long
This post
was original published two days ago, February 15 (HT LRC). The title says enough: “Turkey is about to
launch a false flag operation so they can invade Syria.”
Then what
do I read today?
A car bomb went off in the Turkish
capital Wednesday near vehicles carrying military personnel, killing at least
28 people and wounding 61 others, officials said.
Things are likely to get worse before they get better.
About the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund. I hear that at current rates of refugee intake the entirety of the wealth fund will be used on maintaining refugees in Norway. That is all of that money, not a part of it.
ReplyDeleteBut open borders is a libertarian principle, right? The government doesn't really own the money in the sovereign wealth fund so the money should be given to the people that are homesteading the fund's money - the refugees!
Makes so much sense. In other news, consistent libertarians never call the cops after being mugged and beaten by criminals because that would be a state intervention.
Question: how can I dissociate myself with these libertarians? I need a new label to describe someone that believes in true freedom.
If you (could) think in terms of private property rather than national borders perhaps the issue would not be as troubling. And as long as the state exists you pretty much have to live with it –including calling the cops.
ReplyDeleteTomO
I never call the cops. Ever. I've had thieves call the cops on me when I caught them in the act of theft(they stole one of my pickups, and appearently didn't want to get shot), but I refuse to call them. After I had 3,000 gallons of fuel stolen, I didn't call them. An "investigator" came to my office because the cops heard I was a victim of theft, ( these fuel thieves had stolen a lot of stuff in town and word got around that I had been stolen from too) I would not talk to them or cooperate in the least. My brother and I were kidnapped a few years ago. We got released when they realized they had the wrong 2 dudes, how we were ever thought to be crooks is still beyond me. They threatened me to keep quiet. I found out where they lived and threatened them back, and made sure they knew I was serious. I didn't call the cops. We are all alive still. But the 2 perps who did this are both in prison for trying to kill each other. Hahaha
ReplyDeleteHave the FBI raid your home sometime. Without a warrant. To arrest a "witness" whose home was destroyed by the FBI in the middle of a Fairbanks winter, and his family needed a place to stay, I reference to the "241" incident in Fairbanks. Yeah they send swat teams to arrest witnesses. You will never call the cops after that.
So, no you don't have to call the cops. I won't, will not ever call the cops.
Stop calling the cops.
Matt, it has everything, and nothing to do with "State intervention". It's a matter of calling criminals in costumes who kill and steal to help and whether you will get shot in the face by the crooks with badges in the process of turning the other thugs in who kill and steal.
ReplyDeleteNever call the cops. Never.