Edition 38,456….
Kevin Dowd, writing
for the Cato Institute, finds fault in the modeling of the Fed and the
risks this faulty modeling introduces into the financial sector.
The U.S. financial system faces a
major, growing, and much under-appreciated threat from the Federal Reserve’s
risk modeling agenda—the “Fed stress tests.”
Bully for you, Kevin.
The principal purpose of these
models is to determine banks’ regulatory capital requirements—the capital
“buffers” to be set aside so banks can withstand adverse events and remain
solvent.
Maybe, or maybe it’s all a PR stunt to pacify the masses
while the looting continues.
Risk models are subject to a number
of major weaknesses. They are usually based on poor assumptions and inadequate
data, are vulnerable to gaming and often blind to major risks. They have
difficulty handling market instability and tend to generate risk forecasts that
fall as true risks build up. Most of all, they are based on the naïve belief
that markets are mathematizable.
Taken right out of “The
Best of Hayek” compendium. With this
introduction, you would think Kevin is ready to hit one out of the park…or…you
would remember he is writing for Cato, where hitting one out of the park is not
a consideration:
The solution to these problems is
legislation…
The solution is congress…congress…. sorry, I interrupted Kevin. Let’s try again:
The solution to these problems is
legislation to prohibit risk modeling by financial regulators and establish a
simple, conservative capital standard for banks based on reliable capital ratios
instead of unreliable models.
And just how would the “conservative capital standard for
banks based on reliable capital ratios” be determined? By who?
Based on what factors? (Hint: it
would take a model.)
The idea that the Fed, with no
credible track record at forecasting, can be entrusted with the task of telling
banks how to forecast their own financial risks, displacing banks’ own risk
systems in the process, is the ultimate in fatal conceits.
So, just who does have a “credible track record at
forecasting” that can therefore “be entrusted with the task of telling banks
how to forecast their own financial risks”?
Unless Congress intervenes, the
United States is heading for a new systemic banking crisis.
This is Kevin’s solution – congress should develop a model! Just another version of central planning for
money and credit.
I offer a better solution – in fact, the only one:
End the Fed.
Exactly, the only solution!
ReplyDelete