Revelation
9: 13 And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns
of the golden altar which is before God,
14 Saying to the sixth angel which
had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river
Euphrates.
15 And the four angels were loosed,
which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to
slay the third part of men.
16 And the number of the army of
the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of
them.
Many Evangelical Christians will celebrate joyously on
Sunday, firm in their belief that Donald Trump is delivering to them their
Rapture, Armageddon and anti-Christ – and the slaying of the third-part of men. Trump has previously proclaimed himself the
best president ever for Israel, or something like that. Now he has taken an overt action that could
lead to war with Iran – the biggest wet dream of Zionists, uniting many (but
not all) Christians and Jews in the United States.
I will cite from two sources through the remainder of this
post.
The
Christians as the Romans Saw Them, Robert L. Wilken (all information Julian
is from this book)
Hubers describes Christian Zionism eschatology:
The modern state of Israel is a
catalyst for the prophetic countdown. If these are the last days, then we
should expect an unraveling of civilization, the rise of evil, the loss of
international peace and equilibrium, a coming antichrist, and tests of faithfulness
to Israel. Above all, political alignments today will determine our position on
the fateful day of Armageddon.
Uniting Christians and Jews!
According to Wilken, in the first centuries of the Church such a thought
would not have been considered by either Christians or Jews or Romans or
Greeks. Such a thought extended even centuries
beyond this:
Medieval Christian attitudes
towards Jews were largely defined by “replacement theology,” which relied on a
heavily allegorical reading of the Old Testament to give credence to a belief
that the Church had “replaced” Israel in God’s salvation plans. (Hubers)
Julian was emperor of Rome in the fourth century. He was the son of Julius Constantius, the
half-brother of Constantine. He was
raised with a solid education in the Greek classics and Christian
Scriptures. It was the latter that made
him a most dangerous critic of the new faith – he knew the Scriptures as well
as anyone. He has come to be known as
Julian the Apostate.
Julian was born in 331, eighteen years after Rome recognized
Christianity as a “licit cult,” but some fifty years before Christianity was
declared the official religion of the Roman world, in 380 – seventeen years
after his death.
Julian was one of the most effective critics of Christianity,
being very well-read and having studied the Scriptures. As Roman emperor – albeit for only nineteen
months until his death – he was also in position to take strong action against
the Christians. This action would come
along two paths: first, an attack on the Christian faith via the Jewish
religion; second, by a curious construction project.
After the 1967 war, when Jerusalem was to pass wholly in
Jewish hands, Billy Graham’s father-in-law, Nelson Bell, who was at that time
editor of Christianity Today, summed up how many dispensationally-inclined
evangelicals felt at the time (Hubers):
…that, for the first time in more
than 2,000 years Jerusalem is now completely in the hands of the Jews gives a
student of the Bible a thrill and a renewed faith in the accuracy and validity
of the Bible.
Thank god (yes, small “g”) for the 1967 war. After 2,000 years, I think many Christians
were starting to lose hope.
Julian was twenty years old when he turned from his
Christian faith. “The philosopher
Maximus of Ephesus was instrumental in leading Julian away from Christianity.” Yet Julian could not announce his apostacy,
as his cousin was both emperor and Christian.
He stayed in the closet for ten years.
In the meantime, he led Roman armies in victories over the
Franks and Germans; Julian then presented his cousin with the reality – backed by
the army – that he preferred to be emperor.
His cousin conveniently died before the two met.
Hal Lindsey would publish The Late Great Planet Earth
in 1969, fortuitously on the heels of Israel’s victory over Jerusalem; it would
become the bestselling non-fiction book of the decade (Hubers):
Lindsey’s book was a popular
presentation of classic dispensationalist themes, beginning with what it said
about Israel:
The same prophets who predicted
the worldwide exile and persecution of the Jews also predicted their
restoration as a nation. It is surprising that many could not see the obvious:
Since the first part of these prophecies came true we should have anticipated that
the second part would come true, also.
Julian was now sole emperor; he no longer needed to pretend
to worship the Christian God. An early edict
required that all teachers should be appointed based on their character –
meaning belief in the specific religious and moral values transmitted through
Greek literature.
He was also free to attack Christianity through his
writing. His knowledge of Christianity
made him an especially potent critic. He
attacked on many fronts, including through the difficult comparisons of the
Jewish texts (Old Testament) and the Christian texts (New Testament) – pointing
out that the Christians, somehow, accepted both.
It is not that he respected the Jewish texts – he ridiculed
the myths and legends; however, he did respect the traditions – it was an old
religion, just as the Greeks had an old religion.
What about the Palestinians? asks Hubers. In 1948, four hundred thirteen Palestinian
villages were razed, ensuring that the Palestinians could never return. In 1967, hundreds of thousands of additional Palestinian
refugees were created. And the Christian
response? Radio Bible Class founder Dr.
M.R. DeHaan offered (Hubers):
…the Balfour declaration gave
Britain the mandate over the entire land of Palestine, the Holy Land. Here we
believe was the golden opportunity. She had it in her power and her right to
clear the land of its unlawful possessors and make it exclusively the homeland for
God’s scattered people.
As Julian saw it, Christianity was an apostacy from the
Jewish faith. Christians emphasized the
destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. as the end of the Jewish religion. Jerusalem was no longer a Jewish city, as all
Jews were driven out. Never before was
the city devoid totally of Jews, and never had they been driven out for so
long.
Judaism was no more; the Christians were the rightful and
sole heirs of this tradition. As long as
the temple was in ruins and the city devoid of Jews, it seemed that the
Christians were correct. Julian was in a
position to take this argument away from the Christians.
What would be the impact of
Christian appeals on history if the Temple were no longer in ruins and the Jews
not only returned to the city but once again offered sacrifices in their
Temple? …What greater proof could there be that Christianity was false and that
the Jews, not the Christians, were the rightful inheritors of the ancient
tradition of Israel?
If the temple was to be rebuilt, that would pretty much do
away with Jesus’s prophecy that no stone will be standing on another. Yet this isn’t how Hal Lindsey saw it – and Christian
Zionists see it: the temple will be rebuilt today, as it must in order to fulfill
“prophecy.”
Christian Zionists have adopted
what is considered even by many Israelis to be the most extreme and
problematical position vis-à-vis the occupation--that of the militant settler
movement.
Yes. Christian
Zionists have made enemies even among Israeli Jews. But this won’t slow down the train.
“The Jews are authorized by the
living God and creator of the universe as a legitimate, eternal people with
unalienable rights to the entire Land of Israel,” says Ian Lustick,
characterizing their views. “The Palestinians have absolutely no legitimate
claim to nationhood or to any part of the country.” (Hubers)
The Palestinians? Is there
no Christian love for the Palestinians?
…one would expect followers of
Christ who are actively engaged in the area to address the Palestinian plight
at some length. Yet relatively little is said about the human cost of this
nation-building exercise in Christian Zionist literature. (Hubers)
Wait. I have heard
something like this before. Where? Who?
Who, after all, speaks today of the
annihilation of the Armenians?
-
Adolph Hitler,
22 August, 1939
Now, for pointing out that Christians such as these are no
better than Nazis, I am certain to be labeled a Nazi. Oh, and an anti-Semite for pretty much this
post and everything else I have written on this topic.
Conclusion
From the Fourth International Christian Congress on Biblical
Zionism, held in Jerusalem in February 2001:
Christians must take courageous action
to support the return of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel in all its parts…
The Bible puts its full weight behind the Return of the Jewish exiles to Eretz
Israel. Therefore Christians have no biblical grounds upon which to base
support for Palestinian nationalism.
Funny how few Christians ever believed such a thing until
the last couple of centuries. The Christian fathers, scholastics, monks, and
saints (to say nothing of Martin
Luther) must have all missed this – probably too busy with more trivial
matters of salvation and the like.
In the winter of 362 – 363, Julian appointed his close
friend, Alypius, to oversee the rebuilding of the temple.
The construction, however, was abruptly
cut short later in the spring by an earthquake or some other disaster. The pagan historian Ammianus Marcellinus said
that balls of fire burst from underneath the foundations, and Christian
historians reported that fire came down from heaven to burn the site and the
workers. The project was abandoned.
In June, Julian was killed in battle. And that was that.
Perhaps a warning from history – or God? Let’s pray that history repeats itself. Soon. With
minimal loss of innocent life.
As for the guilty, I am a fan of destruction in Biblical
proportions.
Amazingly you got it right that it was Theodosius in 380 who made Xianity the state religion. Almost nobody, whatever their religious views, gets it right these days...details,details...
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone recall Julian's final comment regarding Christ? He knew the outcome and finally admitted it.
Delete