The
Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East, by Eugene Rogan
The British War Council met in
London on 2 January 1915 to consider an urgent war request for assistance from
the commander in chief of the Russian army.
As recently as 27 December, the Russians were on the verge
of being encircled by the Ottoman Army in the Caucasus. After deliberations, Britain initiated
planning for the Dardanelles campaign. Unknown
to the British, by the time of this War Council meeting, Russia was on the
verge of total victory. Yet, learning of
this shortly thereafter, the British decided to forge ahead anyway – as fateful
and disastrous a decision as any taken on the western front.
Field Marshall Kitchener was the loudest voice in the
Council. He felt a naval operation along
the Mediterranean coast would be sufficient to draw Ottoman troops away from
the Russians and the Caucasus due to fear of risk to the capital, Istanbul. Kitchener turned to Winston Churchill, the
first lord of the Admiralty, tasking him to measure the feasibility of the endeavor. Churchill raised the stakes: more than just
bombing coastal positions why not force the Straits and go on to the capital?
The Dardanelles run over forty miles from the Mediterranean
to the Sea of Marmara; at the Narrows, the distance between the shores of
Europe and Asia is as little as 1.600 yards.
The path was strewn with undersea mines.
Admiral Carden replied to Churchill: the Straits could be
forced with naval power alone. But by
this time, news came of the Russian successes.
So the objective changed: instead of going now to aid their Russian
allies, the British would go to conquer a weakened Turkey, believed to be on
the brink of collapse.
The French promised full support in the Mediterranean, and
the Russians promised to simultaneously attack the northern Straits from the
Black Sea. And, as was expected for the
time, the Allies immediately went into negotiations to divide up the soon-to-be
dissolved remains of the Ottoman Empire.
By early February, the British and French had massed their
fleets in the Mediterranean. They would soon come to conclude that some ground
troops might actually be necessary in the assault; between the British and the
French, soon over 60,000 troops would be assembled.
Naval operations began on 19 February – eighteen battleships,
including the massive Queen Elizabeth. With a range farther than the capability of
the Turkish guns onshore, the navy was free to fire without risk. Only when British ships approached the shore
to assess the damage, the Turkish gunners returned fire.
News of the attack panicked Istanbul. The Ottoman government and the palace left
the city and set up shop in Anatolia; the treasury was doing the same with its
gold. The British were anticipating a
government crisis that would topple the Young Turk government.
And then catastrophe for the British and French. On 18 March, several ships were able to enter
the Straits – to include the Queen
Elizabeth. After being hit by
Turkish shelling, the French ship Bouvet
turned to leave the Straits. Then it all
really went bad: being carried downstream by the strong currents, it struck a
mine.
The explosion blew a hole in the hull; the ship capsized
within two minutes with nearly all of its crew of 724 trapped inside – and then
it immediately plunged to the ocean floor.
Sixty-two men survived.
The Allies were caught by surprise with the mine explosion;
it hadn’t dawned on them that the Ottomans might lay new mines after the
British finished sweeping operations days earlier. These new mines caught the Bouvet, and would quickly strike the Inflexible, Irresistible, and Ocean. Four ships in a matter of a few hours.
And this was before artillery fire from the shore struck the
Suffren and Gaulois. Even the Queen Elizabeth suffered five hits. All Allied ships were recalled from the
Straits, escaping to safety.
Three battleships sunk, three others badly damaged; over
1,000 lives lost and hundreds wounded. One-third
of the Allied battle fleet was lost in a single day – with nothing to show for
the effort. The events of 18 March
brought to an end the naval campaign. Not
leaving bad enough alone, the Allies began to work out a land campaign; after
all, to withdraw after such a disastrous defeat would not be honorable.
The Allies took one month to develop their battle plan. The Turks, aided by German military officers,
took the month to fortify their positions.
On 25 April the assault began. From
the beginning, nothing went to plan – with results as disastrous and futile as
those realized in the naval campaign.
The Allies successfully landed 50,000 men (after accounting
for the dead and wounded) yet were unable to secure a single one of their
objectives. Casualty rates as high as 30
percent within the first days, with nothing but a few hundred yards to show for
it. Ottoman casualty rates were as high –
and higher when the Ottomans attempted a counter-attack.
After a month of horrific fighting, a stalemate ensued: just
as in the western front, this south-eastern front would turn into a body churning
trench war. This, combined with the
arrival of German U-boats, certainly offset any possible Allied advantage, and
made stalemate almost certain.
The situation in Gallipoli caused a political crisis at
home. The Liberal government was forced
to accept cabinet members from the Conservative Party – one casualty was
Churchill, replaced as Lord of the Admiralty by Arthur James Balfour. It wasn’t the Ottoman government that fell,
but the British.
Lord Kitchener – who, despite having been perhaps most
responsible for the planning that led to the disaster, remained in office – presented
three options to the newly formed Dardanelles Committee.
Britain and its Allies could
abandon the Gallipoli campaign altogether.
They could dispatch a major army to conquer the peninsula. Or they could continue to reinforce the small
expeditionary force under Sir Ian Hamilton in the hope of making slow but
steady progress towards the eventual conquest of Gallipoli.
Option one was ruled out immediately: lose to Muslims here
and there would be Muslim uprisings throughout the Allied and Allied-controlled
portions of the Ottoman Empires. After debating
the other two options, it was decided to dispatch a major Army: five divisions
would be sent, each comprised of 10,000 – 15,000 men.
Over the summer, trenches would form a complex grid
throughout the landscape. Those who saw
battle on both the western front and Gallipoli felt that, of the two, the
latter was far worse. Unlike the western
front, where a soldier might go months without firing his rifle, on Gallipoli
the fighting was constant. With the
Turks holding the high ground and the German U-boats driving the British navy
far from shore, Turkish artillery pounded the Allied trenches with impunity. And this says nothing of the snipers.
Leave. There was no
place to take leave, unlike on the western front where towns and villages were
just a few miles away, offering respite.
The soldiers were afraid of being attacked, but more afraid
of going on the attack. Wave after wave
would be sent, only to be mowed down by Turkish fire. Dead bodies by the thousands filled the land
between the combatants. In the intense
summer heat, the flies filled the skies.
The flies accompanying the dead also accompanied the living – to include
the food rations. Sickness traveled from
the dead to the living.
Week after week the casualties mounted, by the thousands and
tens-of-thousands. Yet, one more
push. A successful marine landing:
twenty-thousand men landed on a beach defended by no more than 1,500 Ottoman
soldiers. Alas, an opportunity lost:
unaware of the relatively small force opposite, the British commanders gave
their men a day of rest. And during this
day, the Ottomans reinforced their positions.
Two months later, 11 October, the first discussion of evacuation
was raised; even evacuation was not risk free, with casualty estimates as high
as fifty-percent. One month later, the “prime
mover” of the campaign, Lord Kitchener, came to visit for the first time:
He saw Gallipoli and he understood:
“The country is much more difficult than I imagined…and the Turkish positions…are
natural fortresses which, if not taken by surprise at first, could be held
against very serious attack by larger forces than have been engaged.”
The decision to evacuate was made on 7 December; over the
course of two nights, ending 20 December, 77,000 soldiers were successfully evacuated
with not a single casualty. The British,
it seems, were far more careful with the plans of evacuation than they had been
with their plans of conquest.
Conclusion
Initially it was thought that 50,000 could secure the
Straits. Even after a force of over
half-a-million was deployed, this was not accomplished. They faced an Ottoman contingent of over
300,000. Of the roughly 800,000 men who
fought in the campaign, perhaps 500,000 were killed, wounded or taken prisoner.
Gallipoli, for the Allies, was a total defeat.
Epilogue
If you have not seen the movie Gallipoli,
with a young Mel Gibson, it is well worth it if you want a visual of the utter
catastrophe that was the Gallipoli campaign.
Just multiply what you see by about 10,000.
"The Germans are crucifying kittens to church doors in Belgium!"
ReplyDeleteI'll never forget the line in *Gallipoli* uttered by an older, patriotic Aussie woman, encouraging the two lads (including the Mel Gibson character) when they announced their intention to join Her Majesty's armed forces.
You can't have a splendid little (or big) war without a good atrocity narrative. "And so it goes," as Vonnegut did say.
One of the best anti-war movies ever made.
DeletePeter Weir is an excellent film maker, sad he hasn't made a movie since 2010 (The away Back).
DeleteIt has been a long time since I saw the movie. I may have to re-watch it.
ReplyDeleteHave you considered a section on movies, or plays, that are based on historical events and you think are worth watching?
I will throw 3 movies that are tough to watch but are historically based (could be subdivided to fiction / non-fiction) and are worth watching. I think that it would fit the culture aspect of our discussions.
Joyeux Noel
The WW1 Christmas truce.
To End All Wars
Allied POWs railroad building in Burma.
So to speak, the real bridge over the river Kwai.
Sophie Scholls - The Last Days
The last days of Sophie, a member of the White
Rose, a anti-Nazi pamphleteering student group.
Based on actual trial documentation.
Try Tae Guk Gi - The Brotherhood of War about the Korean war. It's like Private Ryan on steroids but demonstrating the futility of picking sides.
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taegukgi_(film)
Hey bionic great article. One thing to add on the Conclusion. Gallipoli is a major event in Australian (and New Zealand) every year event called ANZAC (Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) day is remember for all Australians (and New Zealanders) that die in overseas war past and present.
ReplyDeleteWhat is interesting is that it is on the day of the landing on Gallipoli in 1915 because it mean a lot for the nation. It is weird to celebrate a loss. The reason is more on the three things,
One it was the first conflict that Australia as an Nation went into.
Two it is sort of anti war and I always got the feeling anti British and anti generals. This is since the soldiers are just following orders and the Australians (and New Zealanders) did it well.
Three it is more about how ANZAC soldiers were put in an impossible situation but did not run and always help his fellow Anzac risking life to save his team. Events of Australian soldiers gaping and throwing back Turkish bombs, another of soldiers risking going to no mans land to get dead, dying or injury mates back to camp.
Don't get me wrong war is awful. It is interesting that Australian before the first world war and the second thought of themselves as British subjects not Australians. World War 2 with the threat of the Japanese Invasion and Churchill not wanting the Australian forces to leave North Africa which the Australian Prime Minster broke and sent ships to pick up forces to bring back to help the homeland. Also Churchill did care to send any help and with that Australia turn to the America and has been allied ever since. Kind of like the rest of the world turning from the British influence to US. The two World Wars destroy the British Empire not just by men and money alone but more the confident within the empire of the British and the British themselves
Unrelated. Filed under, more evidence Libertarians are clueless. Well, at least he is asking for donations.
ReplyDeleteLibertarian US Senate Candidate Is Seeking To Arm The Homeless
A Michigan candidate for US Senate, Brian Ellison, who is expected to be the Libertarian party’s candidate in the November midterm election, set his sights on raising at least $10,000 to buy 20 pump-action shotguns and provide training for homeless people. Ellison is calling his fundraising campaign “Arm the Homeless,” and the drive has already made international news.
Saying that homeless people are “constantly victims of violent crime,” Ellison believes that providing the homeless with firearms to defend themselves would serve to act as a deterrent.
(snip)
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-21/libertarian-us-senate-candidate-seeking-arm-homeless
Question for those that cleave to the NAP: If this guy dropped 20 homeless people in your neighbourhood that he armed with shotguns, has he violated the NAP? The homeless have the normal distribution of homeless pathologies, like mental illness (schizophrenia etc).
DeleteIt like Afghanistan and arming the jihadist. What could possibly go wrong?
Delete"And this says nothing of the snipers" - ANZAC Billy Sing. His Turkish counter part, who I have not found a name for - other than his nickname - Abdul the Terrible.
ReplyDeleteGallipoli,oh the hubris of Kitchener and Churchill.
Its strange that during WW1 Churchill was fired for the failure of the Gallipoli campaign which he had advocated
ReplyDeleteWhile during WW2 Churchill had advocated “Operation Wilfred” and “Plan R 4” which called for invading Norway and when these plans failed Churchill got promoted to Prime Minister.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wilfred
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_R_4
Often wondered about what was really behind WWI.
ReplyDeleteAround 1905 Germany began building a railroad in the area of Iraq to transport oil back to the homeland. They secured oil through consent, not conquest. A civilized approach. Germany was emerging as a great world economic and industrial power and was a great affront to the British Empire. So, might we think of the Archduke's assassination as a False Flag Event?
You should check out *The Band Played Waltzing Matilda* by the Pogues. Shane MacGowan's lugubrious brogue lends the lyrics impossible poignancy:
ReplyDeleteWhen I was a young man I carried my pack
And I lived the free life of a rover
From the Murrays green basin to the dusty outback
I waltzed my Matilda all over
Then in nineteen fifteen my country said Son
It's time to stop rambling 'cause there's work to be done
So they gave me a tin hat and they gave me a gun
And they sent me away to the war
And the band played Waltzing Matilda
As we sailed away from the quay
And amidst all the tears and the shouts and the cheers
We sailed off to Gallipoli
How well I remember that terrible day
How the blood stained the sand and the water
And how in that hell that they called Suvla Bay
We were butchered like lambs at the slaughter
Johnny Turk he was ready, he primed himself well
He chased us with bullets, he rained us with shells
And in five minutes flat he'd blown us all to hell
Nearly blew us right back to Australia
But the band played Waltzing Matilda
As we stopped to bury our slain
We buried ours and the Turks buried theirs
Then we started all over again
Now those that were left, well we tried to survive
In a mad world of blood, death and fire
And for ten weary weeks I kept myself alive
But around me the corpses piled higher
Then a big Turkish shell knocked me arse over tit
And when I woke up in my hospital bed
And saw what it had done, I wished I was dead
Never knew there were worse things than dying
For no more I'll go waltzing Matilda
All around the green bush far and near
For to hump tent and pegs, a man needs two legs
No more waltzing Matilda for me
So they collected the cripples, the wounded, the maimed
And they shipped us back home to Australia
The armless, the legless, the blind, the insane
Those proud wounded heroes of Suvla
And as our ship pulled into Circular Quay
I looked at the place where my legs used to be
And thank Christ there was nobody waiting for me
To grieve and to mourn and to pity
And the band played Waltzing Matilda
As they carried us down the gangway
But nobody cheered, they just stood and stared
Then turned all their faces away
And now every April I sit on my porch
And I watch the parade pass before me
And I watch my old comrades, how proudly they march
Reliving old dreams of past glory
And the old men march slowly, all bent, stiff and sore
The forgotten heroes from a forgotten war
And the young people ask, "What are they marching for?"
And I ask myself the same question
And the band plays Waltzing Matilda
And the old men answer to the call
But year after year their numbers get fewer
Some day no one will march there at all
I have a small volume purchased at the Verdun WWI Memorial graveyard titled, "Poems of the Great War 1914-1918." In it are several poems by Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen, among others, on the horrors of that war. Likely one can google many of these. Peggy in Oregon
DeleteThat song was written by a Scottish writer, Eric Bogle. I think the best version was sung by Liam Clancy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFCekeoSTwg
DeleteAlways makes me cry. Epic anti-war song.
Delete