Apparently Germany
has a demographic problem:
Germany’s birth rate has collapsed
to the lowest level in the world and its workforce will start plunging at a
faster rate than Japan's by the early 2020s, seriously threatening the
long-term viability of Europe’s leading economy.
“No other industrial country is
deteriorating at this speed despite the strong influx of young migrant workers.
Germany cannot continue to be a dynamic business hub in the long-run without a
strong jobs market,” warned the [World Economy Institute].
What happens (or should happen) when a person of prudence
contemplates aging and retirement?
Usually, saving for retirement is offered as wise counsel – we are
pummeled with reports of the lack of retirement savings by individuals. It seems Germany, nationally, is walking
along a similar path – at least this is the interpretation offered by the
author of the subject article, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard:
The demographic crisis explains why
Germany is so determined to run a budget surplus and drive down its public debt
ratios, hoping to avoid a Japanese-style debt-trap before it is too late.
Sound practice for the micro; is it considered sound
practice for the macro?
The IMF says Germany would do
itself and the rest of the eurozone a favour by spending more to prepare for
its old age, not less.
Oh.
Macro-economics, as currently practiced, is – on every level
– nonsense.
No comments:
Post a Comment