Thus, we have a key piece to the puzzle explaining why the Delta outbreak is so formidable — fully vaccinated are participating as COVID-19 patients and acting as powerful Typhoid Mary-style super-spreaders of the infection.
Vaccinated individuals are blasting out concentrated viral explosions into their communities and fueling new COVID surges. Vaccinated healthcare workers are almost certainly infecting their coworkers and patients, causing horrendous collateral damage.
Peter A. McCullough, M.D., MPH
Dr. McCullough is drawing his conclusions based on a preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group. The study examined vaccinated healthcare workers and found:
Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.
One could call these workers weapons of mass destruction. If this plays out globally, then what we have is a large mass of weapons of mass destruction.
I had a hard time trying to figure out the strategy behind the big push for vaccinations. Sure, I get massive profits; I can even believe the depopulation narrative. But it would be the most compliant sheep that would become the depopulated. Is that really the best strategy if one wants to further centralize control?
I recall reading of the Red Army’s push toward Warsaw, toward the end of World War II. As the Poles were fighting the Germans in Warsaw, Stalin stopped short. Those courageous enough to fight the Germans would also next fight the Soviets. Let the majority of the Polish fighters die against the Germans, and the Soviets would inherent the remaining docile population. So, the Red Army waited.
So, why would those in control of this disaster of the last eighteen months have a strategy to kill off only their most adamant supporters, those most willing to acquiesce to any demand? I kept wondering: is there something in the jab that – while of danger to those jabbed – is more dangerous to those not jabbed?
Maybe now I have an answer…time to mask up.
There are numerous theories as to why the push is on for 100% compliance to The Jab (I will not call it a vaccine). Brandon Smith at Alt-Markets has promoted one which I find compelling. Whether he is right remains to be seen.
ReplyDeletehttps://alt-market.us/why-are-globalists-and-governments-so-desperate-for-100-vaccination-rates/
However, since the masks do not work to prevent infections, I will rely on my immune system, which has worked quite well over the last 63 years.
Not inconsistent with my view.
DeleteAs to my comment about masks, 90% tongue in cheek; 10%, to the extent spike proteins are shed by the vaccinated, proteins are larger than viruses.
With all that said, I, too, will keep my faith in the immunity God gave me (and appropriate vitamins, sunshine, etc.)
The idea that masks do not work is false. I am a medical and aerospace engineer with credidations in chemistry, o chem, micro biology, anatomy, physiology, fluid dynamics, advanced materials, and biology.
DeleteEven though this article is correct on the vaccine, masks is a different story. I have done real tests with rwal infected people, growing viruses and pathogens and then testing with masks. My results are exactly what my math proved it to be.
First, viruses are stupid simple things. They are non living and in order to infect humans they MUST take control of a hoat cell to use its organs, food supply etc to replicate. These host cells are massive in size, about 0.5 microns. They are what we breathe out and what we call droplet transmission. Thats exactly how viruses are transfered, via the droplet method.
A mask of 600tpi cotton, even with a gap, can still filter 98% of particles above 0.3 microns.
Now lets pretend that we do breathe out viruses themselves, about 0.1 microns in size, they are extremely easy to catch based on a particle physics behavior called brownian motion.
Particles below 0.3 microns bounce off od o2, nitrogen, and other gasses in the atmosphere, which means they bounce into the masks rather than floating in a linear path. Think of bouncing a baseball into a soccer net, less chance of the ball passing through. The reason n95 masks are labeled 95% of 0.3 microns is because 0.3 microns ia the HARDEST to catch. They float in a linear path, like throwing the baseball through the net. This is why n95 material is statically charged to be an electro magnet to help capture particles.
Second, not every breath we exhale has infect3d cells, known as the viral load. Since we breathe out infected host cells, they are very heavy and gravity helps pull them down. They also stick to our face and the mask because they are wet, oily particles.
I can supply alot of math if you want to see it as well as all my petri dishes.
Well, I will pretend that your masks work and you pretend that I am wearing one. Ditto to your comment below.
DeleteBTW, you ought to add spelling to your repertoire of credentials.
For another point of view, see this explanation. Philipp Bagus calls it a face-saving ploy. He wanders somewhat and there are numerous typos, but it is worth reading.
ReplyDelete"So, sooner or later, the lockdown must be ended. If, however, the state authorities were to back out of the lockdowns and restrictions without further explanation and imply that the danger was not so great after all and that the restrictions were an exaggeration and a mistake, they would lose a great deal of support and trust among the population. Consequently, from a governmental perspective, a good and face-saving "exit scenario" from the most severe restrictions is needed, and the vaccination campaign provides it."
https://mises.org/wire/vaccine-mandates-and-great-reset
Yes, but then they could have just claimed victory at 60% herd immunity (or whatever fake jabbed rate number that they want to peddle).
DeleteWell, I admit I do not have the answer as to why it has to be 100% compliance. Misery loves company, perhaps?
DeleteRoger, the day may come where this misery will be put into action. If some of the long term harms are as significant as many immunologists and other doctors suggest, the jabbed will look to take out the anger of their irreversible choice on the unjabbed.
DeleteIt is possible that TPTB have lost control of their strategy. It could be that they know they went too far (overreach, made a huge mistake) and cannot back down. If they did, heads would roll, including some very big ones and the entire structure would be in jeopardy. Therefore, maintain the course and hope for the best.
DeleteAnd, then, there are those who are constantly agitating for "more", driving this situation as far as it will go, regardless of the consequences. Commit, no matter what and give it everything you have. It's all for the Cause, dear.
Considering that those who scream the loudest usually get their way (at least in politics), it is not surprising that the extremists seem to be winning this battle. Appearances can be deceiving, however, and just because we were "sucker punched" and rocked back on our heels does not mean that all is lost.
"There's no stopping a man who knows he's in the right and keeps a-coming." -- Louis L'Amour
I fully agree - until the last line. As Roger said, the actual, real science on masks is clear: since COVID is aerosolized it goes right through the mask so masks make statistically zero effect.
ReplyDeleteYou can find all the science here in one place:
https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
(btw, I highly recommend Swiss Policy Research on everything COVID)
Most "science" showing masks effective are junk science with models or very low quality evidence. The only reasonable theory I've found is that masks somewhat reduce the viral load on inhalation (i.e wearer protection) and therefore might blunt the strength of infections. However, this theory is also based on low quality evidence like observational data in different situations with many confounding factors - i.e. apples to oranges.
So masking is highly unlikely to prevent you from any COVID.
Healthy lifestyle (healthy diet, exercise, good sleep, healthy psyche), and stock up on effective early treatment (ivermectin, HCQ, Vit C/D, Zinc, at least).
See my reply to Roger above.
DeleteFalse on the idea that aerosolized particles pass through the mask. I am a medical and aerospace engineer with credidations in chemistry, ochem, micro biology, biology, fluid dynamics, advanced materials science and anatomy.
DeleteYou are right on one thing, the other studies are done by unqualified people, bad math and totally inaccurate science.
Aerosols are super simple to capture bexause the smallest particles we breath out are 0.5 microns in size. A basic surgical masks is 95% of 0.3 microns.
And i lnow your going to ask, what about particles the size of 0.1 microns, the size of an actual virus? Excellent question, to andwer that, one must know how viruses work. Viruses are non living and innorder to replicate and infect people, they take over very large host cells to use their organs and food supply. These hoat cells are 0.4 to 0.75 microns in size. These are the aerosols we breath out. Its calles the droplet transmission method. Now lets pretwnd viruses do not need a host cell to infect, since they are very very small, they actually are easier to capture because they bounce off of air, nitrogen and other gasses. This is called brownian motion. Particles below 0.3 bounce and above 0.3 fall. This is why we use 0.3 microns as the defacto, its the hardest to capture. Think of bouncing a baseball into a soccer net, the ball has a large chance of staying in the net
I have done many many tests with real viruses and real people using many household fabrics and all my math and tests have come back showing that it does indeed block particles. I used many many many petri dishes for verification as well. Petri dishes are the only way to test because they will actually grow rapidly if ANYTHING falls on them. I even dis tests in peoples homes and the petri dishes came back clean with zero growth. I have alot of math on this and experience. Immunology is one of my favorites as well as particle physics. And yes i do have both degrees.
I only add this comment as another perspective, not a mandate. If you dont like masks, thats fine with me, i dont force it. My mission is to educate teuth and then allow people to make thier own choice and i dont judge:)
Bionic - you're attributing intelligence to evil that might not be true at all.
ReplyDeleteHere's the historic sequence of human experience - first they scare DaBejeebers out of you, which leads you to abandon all reason and logic and thus become insane - this mental condition then is orchestrated by your rulers and their demon cohorts to literally become demonic in behavior - a state of mind which is UNABLE to discern between good and evil, or reality from delusion.
That is exactly what happened to Israel in 70 AD - and which Jesus prophesied 40 years before, while He walked the earth with His disciples, prior to His crucifixion.
If one has eyes to to see.......
Crush, the process you have described takes significant intelligence on the part of the string pullers. Consider the effort necessary to pull of what they pull off - going back decades to purposefully corrupting the education systems (among other avenues).
DeleteAgree completely - in fact, it's a prerequisite, which Antonio Gramsci and his disciples accomplished exquisitely over 100 years.
DeleteIt sort of parallels the centuries of Talmudic teaching which eventually led to Israel's rejection of the OT promised Messiah. But when the Talmudic conditioning became prevalent, their destruction was baked on the cake, so to speak.
I see the same phenomenon occurring now as I speak.
Eventually, the servants of Satan outsmart themselves.
"... their destruction was baked on the cake, so to speak."
DeleteToo smart by half!
I've seen a study in a respectable publication (unsurprisingly ignored by the "respectable" media since it's harmful to their narrative) suggesting that the strategy of protecting against coronavirus by training the immune system to react against the spike protein is not such a great idea, and may in fact make things substantially worse.
ReplyDeleteThe theory (as far as I could understand it) was that "non-neutralizing" (ineffective) anti-spike-protein antibodies - such as those the body threw against a previous coronavirus variant - swarm over the viruses and cause an inflammatory response in the respiratory system (pneumonia) without actually neutralizing the threat.
If this is true, the Jabbed may be at substantially greater risk of harm from "variants" (that is, the inevitable mutations of any cold virus). The drug pushers and politicians (the ones who aren't just tagging along cluelessly, which may be a very small number) are thus desperate to prevent a scenario where even the TV-addled masses notice that the Unjabbed are healthier than the Jabbed. Hence the desperate push for 100%.
Funnily enough, this phenomenon seems to have been a problem in the development of vaccines against OTHER viruses, discovered after extensive - wait for it - TESTING.
I don't recall how I got there, might have been from a comment on this very blog:
https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/140421.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
The St. Ignatius of Antioch Orthodox Press is promoting their newest product: the Anthologion. This is a one volume library of Orthodox liturgical texts: the Book of Hours, the Book of the Eight Tones, the General Menaion, the Lenten Triodion and Pentecostarion. The book comes with full information on how to set up the services for home use. The Press's website has a set of fourteen instructional videos to assist the user. To connect with the current topic: the introduction explicitly states that the time may come when we can no longer rely upon the internet. The time may come when we shall lose our churches, which history attests happens oft and again. So, we may need good hard copy books to see us through. Time to mask up, so to speak.
ReplyDeleteFrom purely the perspective of social control, their actions are self defeating. But what if they aren't monolithic. If they are instead a coalition of disparate interests temporarily cooperating, then their actions make a bit more sense. Let's say they're elites comprising: power brokers and political technicians who want more leverage over people, well connected profiteers looking for a windfall, World Government devotees who want the IMF to be the world's central bank, eugenics people who want harsher evolutionary filters, Club of Rome-ers who want to address perceived overpopulation, and transhumanists who want to use CRISR and RNA fragments to directly modify humanity. Elites from these various groups could bring clout and manpower sufficient to cause all that has happened so far; and all these have benefited from the COVID media phenomenon. If indeed this is a coalition, then their differing interests will soon cause them to diverge and put them at odds. Perhaps anticipation of their divergence explains their frantic push for immediate, universal vaccination.
ReplyDeleteFrom the very beginning, the FDA EAU applications noted the problem of shedding of the spike protein. Masking up will not do much of anything. The desire to get the planet vaxxed is just to accelerate the process and for added profits. Ultimately, they don't need to vaccinate anyone as only 30% of the population needs to be vaccinated in order to transmit or infect the rest of the herd. Nothing less than total isolation from those infected will suffice.
ReplyDelete