Pages

Saturday, October 14, 2017

Harvey Weinstein: The Back Story



You know the story:

The New York Times last week broke the story of Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s long record of sexual harassment.

This had been going on for thirty years or more.  How could no one know the story?

But of course people knew about Harvey Weinstein. Like the New York Times, for instance. Sharon Waxman, a former reporter at the Times, writes in The Wrap how she had the story on Weinstein in 2004—and then he bullied the Times into dropping it. Matt Damon and Russell Crowe even called her directly to get her to back off the story.

See, Weinstein was protected.  Two things brought him down.  First, Weinstein owned significant resources in the journalist community, resources that were looking to stay on good terms with a major producer; through this, he was greatly able to control the story:

It’s because the media industry that once protected him has collapsed. The magazines that used to publish the stories Miramax optioned can’t afford to pay for the kind of reporting and storytelling that translates into screenplays.

It is because the best reporting is coming from bloggers, from the internet.  No one is paying for the privilege of reading so-called “news” put out by the gatekeepers.  So-called “fake news” is winning the day.

But this is nothing.  Second:

Rebecca Traister says the stories are coming out now because “our consciousness has been raised.” Between Bill Cosby and Roger Ailes, Bill O’Reilly, and Donald Trump, argues Traister, people are now accustomed to speaking and hearing the truth about famous, sexually abusive men.

This is wrong. It has nothing to do with “raised consciousness”—or else she wouldn’t have left off that list the one name obviously missing.

Yes, this is wrong, and it is wrong because the name left off of the list points to the primary reason that a) Weinstein has remained protected, and b) why he no longer is:

Which brings us, finally, to the other reason the Weinstein story came out now: Because the court over which Bill Clinton once presided, a court in which Weinstein was one part jester, one part exchequer, and one part executioner, no longer exists.

A thought experiment: Would the Weinstein story have been published if Hillary Clinton had won the presidency? No, and not because he is a big Democratic fundraiser. It’s because if the story was published during the course of a Hillary Clinton presidency, it wouldn’t have really been about Harvey Weinstein. Harvey would have been seen as a proxy for the president’s husband and it would have embarrassed the president, the first female president.

Bill Clinton offered get-out-of-jail-free cards to a whole army of sleazeballs, from Jeffrey Epstein to Harvey Weinstein to the foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative.

Conclusion

Perhaps this is one of the main reasons that Hollywood is so up in arms about Clinton losing, Trump winning, and Putin.  Sleazeballs, every single one of them; sleazeballs that would see us in a nuclear war before giving up their corrupt and empty lifestyles.

Hillary did not need to look across Middle America to find the deplorables; she needed only to look at the tool next to her…and to look in the mirror.

5 comments:

  1. Amazing... all the players who perpetuate the nastier aspects of life. I think it was the late Jeff Huber who wrote about how everyone at or near the top has something to hide. Easier to control that way. All the more reason for their attempts at silencing and demonetizing the flow of information.

    And through it all, Teflon Bill keeps rolling along. He must have the goods on a great many people. Well, that and those surrounding him dropping like Star Trek security redshirts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The last sentence hits the political bull's eye. It is witty to hang the willing executioner with his own noose. It also happens to be true, I think.

    Regards, Spiral

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://educate-yourself.org/cn/franklincoverupexcerpt.shtml



    Owyhee Cowboy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yikes...

      As for protecting the system, I have a value system that comes first.

      Delete
    2. Interesting article. This book is related. A true story written by a former CIA agent, it reads like a hollywood blockbuster. The parts featuring Slick Willy are particularly entertaining.

      https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B075JP2BR5/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1508121960&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=compromised+bush+clinton+cia

      Delete