Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, by Timothy Snyder
Take your choice:
Many Europeans, distressed by the
nazification of Germany, looked hopefully to Moscow for an ally.
Or:
For some of the Germans and other
Europeans who favored Hitler and his enterprise, the cruelty of Soviet policy
seemed to be an argument for National Socialism.
This was the world facing those in Central and Eastern
Europe in the 1930s. What a choice…as if
anyone living there had much of a choice.
Hitler significantly consolidated power in 1933. The Reichstag fire, election victories
(thanks to the support of the German communists, on orders from Stalin), the
first concentration camps, an enabling act allowing Hitler to rule by
decree. All big news throughout the
western world, compared to the minor news item of the millions killed by the
intentional famines
and deportations occurring in the Soviet Union at the same time.
Internationally, Stalin was given a pass: “…with the help of
many sympathizers abroad….” Hitler was
confronted with “voices of criticism and outrage.” This at a time when the deaths attributable
to Stalin’s policies were infinitely greater than those attributable to
Hitler’s.
Hitler’s terror, at this time, was one of intimidation – he
locked up subversive (in his view) elements; he did not eliminate these, at
least not in meaningful numbers. In the
meantime, Germany signed a non-aggression declaration with Poland – at the same
time that Stalin was killing and otherwise purging Poles within the Soviet
Union by the thousands.
Stalin took further advantage of the rise of Nazi Germany;
he shifted the focus of the communist struggle from one of class vs. class to
one of all of the left against the fascists.
This could explain Roosevelt’s attraction. Stalin
helped birth National Socialism in Germany, and then attempted to
consolidate the left (via The
Popular Front) to fight it; Stalin saw war as the best means to advance the
revolution.
Despite the overwhelming excesses of Stalin’s regime,
propaganda and formed public opinion made Hitler out as the tyrant. Who didn’t want to be against Nazi’s, after
all? Statements that in any way
suggested that Stalin was a far worse criminal than Hitler were met with
charges of Nazi sympathizer. Nothing much
has changed in this regard.
While the international chess pieces were coming in place,
Stalin could not afford to ignore the internal situation. Having few if any political enemies remaining
within the Soviet Union only seemed to convince him that the opposition was
only becoming skillful at political invisibility. On 7 November 1937, Stalin raised a toast
(emphasis added):
“We will mercilessly destroy anyone
who, by his deeds or his thoughts – yes,
his thoughts! – threatens the unity of the socialist state. To the complete destruction of all enemies,
themselves and their kin.”
Stalin knew what today’s advocates of the war on terror know
but will not state openly: when you want to destroy thoughts (ideological
enemies), every family member and acquaintance of those you kill are newly created
potential enemies. They must also be
destroyed…mercilessly. Perhaps bombing
wedding parties is, therefore, intentional?
Stalin had the state police – the NKVD – to affect such a
policy, his terror. Using the political
assassination of his close comrade, Sergei Kirov, to his advantage, Stalin
blamed terrorists for the murder – not satisfied merely with the arrest and
conviction of the assassin.
He forced through a special law
allowing for the swift execution of “terrorists.” Emphasizing the threat of terrorism, he
declared that his former politburo opponents on the left plotted the murder of
the Soviet leadership and overthrow of Soviet power.
The “threat of terrorism.”
I guess Stalin had his own war on terror.
Beginning in August 1936, show trials began; more than a
dozen former political opponents (and Trotsky allies) were tried, sentenced to
death, and executed. A narrative of a
grand conspiracy, a “Center of Centers,” was developed by Stalin’s henchman
Nikolai Yezhov – for whom opposition equaled terrorism.
Guantanamo, secret tribunals, kill lists, national security
letters, a nebulous enemy allowing for complete leeway regarding who is
targeted, a grand conspiracy of “they hate us for our freedom” – all modeled after
a previously successful program.
Purges within the party and the NKVD followed. High commanders of the armed forces were
tried; about half of the generals of the Red Army would be executed in the
months to come. Of 139 members of the
central committee who took part in the party congress of 1934, 98 were shot.
Altogether, the purification of the armed forces, party
leadership and various state institutions resulted in about fifty thousand
executions.
While Stalin was purging in the tens-of-thousands, Hitler
was purging in the dozens. Hitler used
Heinrich Himmler’s SS to murder Ernst Röhm, leader of the SA brownshirts and
several dozen of his cohorts – greatly increasing his standing with the
military. The charge was that Röhm was
planning a coup. In addition, several
political and other leaders were similarly dispatched, in what became known as
the “Night of
the Long Knives.” Somewhere between
85 and a few hundred were murdered in this purge.
Stalin, meanwhile, was just getting started:
The Soviet purges within the army,
party, and NKVD were the prelude to Stalin’s Great Terror, which in 1937 and
1938 would take the lives of hundreds of thousands of people for reasons of
class and nation.
Again it was the kulaks that were targeted – at least
initially. Millions of kulaks had
survived the earlier deportations; now they were rejoining collective farms and
returning to the Orthodox Church. Many
remained in the eastern part of Russia – might they support a Japanese
invasion? Might their experience lead
them to rebellion? To ask such questions
in Stalin’s regime was to answer these.
In July 1937, Stalin issued general instructions for mass
repressions in every region. The NKVD
was to register all kulaks residing in their regions and to recommend quotas
for execution and deportation. Suspected
or even possible counter-revolutionaries were to suffer “direct physical
liquidation.” By the end of 1938, the
NKVD executed almost 400,000 Soviet citizens in fulfillment of these orders.
The process was similar to that used during the time of the
famine: troikas, quotas by region, rubber-stamped verdicts, ignoring legal
procedures, no possibility of appeal.
The fulfillment of Order 00447
began with the emptying of the file cabinets.
By definition every kulak had a file, as kulak was a term
created and defined by the state for the purpose of creating a file. Criminals – meaning anyone that had any type
of encounter with the police – also had files.
“Anti-Soviet elements” was a catch all – anyone else on whom the NKVD
had a file.
Those targeted were arrested,
forced to confess, and encouraged to implicate others. Confessions were elicited by torture.
The sentence was death or the Gulag (and the Gulag had its
own death quotas to meet).
Recommendations for sentencing were almost always accepted, with
hundreds of cases processed at a time.
Hitler couldn’t keep up.
Homosexuals, vagrants, alcoholics, those unwilling to work, Jehovah’s
Witnesses – all confined, rarely executed.
These went to the concentration camps – a total of about 20,000 compared
to a million in Stalin’s purge. Per
capita, Stalin confined 25 times the numbers as did Hitler, with an execution
rate almost 700 times higher.
So much for terror based on class…more or less; next came
terror based on nationality…more or less.
People belonging to national
minorities “should be forced to their knees and shot like mad dogs.” It was not an SS officer speaking but a
communist party leader… In 1937 and 1938, a quarter of a million Soviet
citizens were shot on essentially ethnic grounds.
The most persecuted European
national minority in the second half of the 1930s was not the four hundred
thousand or so German Jews (the number declining because of emigration) but the
six hundred thousand or so Soviet Poles (the number declining because of
executions).
The justification for this murder of Soviet Poles was a
fabrication:
The “Polish Military Organization,”
conjured up during the famine in 1933, was sustained as pure bureaucratic
fantasy in Soviet Ukraine, then adapted to justify a national terror of Poles
throughout the Soviet Union.
In January 1937, Nikolai Yezhov
presented to Stalin a plan – a theory of a Polish grand conspiracy. In March, Yezhov purged the NKVD of Polish
officers. When a Pole offered another as
a possible conspirator, both were condemned – one for being implicated and the
other for not doing the implicating sooner.
In August 1937, Yezhov issued an order mandating that the
NKVD totally liquidate the network of Polish spies from the no-longer existent Polish
Military Organization. The meaning of
the order was understood: “destroy the Poles entirely.”
Whereas the extermination of the kulaks could be explained
in class / Marxist terms, this national terror offered no such pretense. There was no longer the idea of a basic
socialist fraternity of working people across nationalities, a
multi-nationalism.
This multi-nationalism was not hypocrisy:
When the show trials began in 1936,
the heights of the NKVD were dominated by men whose own origins were within the
Soviet national minorities, Jews above all.
About forty percent of high-ranking NKVD officers had Jewish nationality
recorded in their identity documents.
By the time the Great Terror was finished, only about four
percent of the NKVD officers would be so identified. The rest were initially perpetrator and then
victim.
Polish communists – members of the central committee of the
Polish party – were not spared execution.
As there was, in reality, no Polish plot, all leading Polish figures
were subject to execution. Once again,
hundreds and thousands were sentenced per day – death or the Gulag (which was
little more than a delayed death for many).
In Leningrad in 1937 and 1938, “Poles were thirty-four times
more likely to be arrested than their fellow Soviet citizens.” The terror was not limited to Russian land –
most Soviet Poles lived in Belarus and Ukraine, lands that Poles had occupied
for hundreds of years. Hundreds of
leading writers and other community leaders were arrested and killed in
Belarus; eventually the Polish population in Belarus fell by more than 60,000
during the time of the Great Terror.
Yet seventy percent of the Soviet Union’s six hundred
thousand Poles lived in Ukraine, where Poles were twelve times more likely than
the local population to be arrested.
Numerous mass graves, executions by the thousands, quotas eagerly
exceeded to demonstrate loyalty, little to no oversight.
Husbands executed; after relocation, also the wives. Thereafter, children could be placed in
orphanages to ensure they would not be raised as Poles. Eventually over one hundred thousand were executed
or transferred to the Gulag.
Further operations were conducted in Latvia, Finland, and
Estonia – with more than 30,000 shot.
Altogether, a member of a targeted minority was twenty times more likely
to be killed in the Great Terror than was the average Soviet Citizen.
For fear of Japan, about 170,000 Soviet Koreans were
transferred west to Kazakhstan; Mongolian authorities (Mongolia being a Soviet
satellite) killed over 20,000. All
killed and relocated for an attack from Japan that was not coming.
Altogether, something over six hundred thousand executions
were carried out during the kulak and national terrors, along with another
50,000 political executions.
Yezhov was replaced by Lavrenty Beria, as Stalin was not
pleased with the former’s supposed excesses.
For this reason, he – along with many of the top officers of the NKVD –
was subsequently executed. The Soviet
Union, far from the people’s paradise, was little more than a demonstration of
a tyrant’s mastery over his political court.
It was noted earlier the significant reduction of Jews in
the NKVD ranks during the Great Terror, yet Jews were blamed for the action:
The Great Terror could be, and by
many would be, blamed on the Jews. To
reason this way was to fall into a Stalinist trap: Stalin certainly understood
that Jewish NKVD officers would be a convenient scapegoat for national killing
actions, especially after both the Jewish secret policemen and the national
elites were dead. In any event, the
institutional beneficiaries of the Terror were not Jews or members of other
national minorities but Russians who moved up the ranks.
Hitler also focused on Jews during this time; however, while
his efforts were more public than were Stalin’s to the outside world, the scale
was much smaller. After Germany entered
Austria, ten thousand Austrian Jews were relocated to Vienna and from there
they left the country. The death toll
from Kristallnacht was measured in the few hundreds.
It was only after Kristallnacht that Jews entered the
concentration camp system in Germany in large numbers; even here, the purpose
was to get them to leave Germany – not extermination. More than 100,000 Jews left Germany in 1938 /
1939.
By 1938, Stalin killed about one thousand times more people
on ethnic grounds than did Hitler – including more Jews, although in Stalin’s
case the Jews were caught up in the general terror, not specifically for
nationality.
Despite this track record, it was Stalin who was viewed as
the protector of Europe from Hitler’s barbarism.
In these years, Hitler was considering relocation as the
solution to the Jewish question. However,
after January 1939 Hitler’s rhetoric against Jews increased dramatically:
“…international finance Jewry…” “…plunging the peoples of the world into a
world war…” “…the result will be…the annihilation of the Jewish race in
Europe.”
Next came the rapprochement between Hitler and Stalin and
the division of Poland. On September 1,
Hitler invaded; two weeks later, Stalin joined him. This set the stage for the terror to come to
Poland. No longer merely trapped between
two madmen, they were now buried by the weight.
Thus far, virtually all of the evil unleashed in these
bloodlands was due to Stalin, almost none of it to Hitler. This would change with the division and
occupation of Poland: Stalin would continue his practices; Hitler would begin
to greatly advance his.
Mind-boggling, what Stalin did. Really incomprehensible, to me. I was familiar with the Ukranian atrocities and the internal purges; I did not know of the targeted actions against the Poles.
ReplyDelete"...Thus far, virtually all of the evil unleashed in these bloodlands was due to Stalin, almost none of it to Hitler...Stalin would continue his practices; Hitler would begin to greatly advance his..."
I think if you expand your reading to David Irving -- does anyone else tell the other side? -- who works from German source documents located in Germany, U.S., and Russia, you may end up with a modified view of Nazi-era Germany and Hitler. I read his works on Hitler, Goebbels, and Goring, all excellent; I could not stomach his book on Dresden -- like the atomic bombings, terrible and unnecessary -- and stopped.
Antony Sutton, in his three books on the Bolsheviks, Hitler, and FDR, does a great job showing that Wall Street and European financiers were behind the rise of International Socialism, National Socialism, and Corporate Socialism in the U.S.S.R., Germany, and the U.S., respectively. My gut sense integration from my reading over the years is that Hitler was no megalomaniac, but only wanted to cleanse Germany from the Weimar excesses that were imposed on it from within and without. Hitler trusted Goring to nearly the end, but Goring -- due to his material excesses -- appears to have been a witting tool of 'dark' Nazis, who were in cahoots with the U.S. O.S.S. My gut sense is that Hitler began his time in power as a 'white Nazi' but was ever at loggerheads with incompetent or sell-out 'dark Nazi' Generals and out-of-control internal administrators.
WWII is much more complicated, I have found, than when I began reading about it as a child 40 years ago. The extent of behind-the-scenes forces in the '30s and '40s was mind-shattering for me, from my reads of 'The Plot to Seize the White House' (right-wing elements were plotting to overthrow newly-elected FDR and to impose a Nazi-style regime in the U.S.), 'From Major Jordan's Diaries' (we were shipping uranium and atomic bomb parts to the Soviets during WWII, at the direction of Harry Dexter White), 'Target: Patton,' 'America's Nazi Secret,' 'The Controversy of Zion,' and 'Nuremberg: The Last Battle,' amongst others.
It is shocking, but fascinating, to sort through things to attempt to arrive at truth. I enjoy the journey. But, my findings are not palatable to my friends and family, so I largely keep them to myself.
Revisionist history (and economics) is fascinating, and makes great sense to me. But, just wait, b-m-, until you start exploring revisionist religion and science!
John G. March
DeleteI totally agree what you said ! This is the only correct version of the truth !
I have had the same experience as you had in the last 50 years about this subject !
Since I was +7 I've seen a lot of contradiction between the official lesson and the reality ! . Later I have had wonderful history professors, telling the truth about events ( precisely as you said btw, strange coincidence !!??) , not politically correct , even I was living in a "communist dictature land ! "
Huge paradox, I've read all about this truth in years '60, secondary school period about things/facts that only in years '90 were disclosed to the public in the Western democracy. That made me to discover that in the Western democracy censure ship and manipulation, distortion, lies and deceit /diversion was much more gigantic then in my child period dictatorship !
All what you said it was to me the common place , 20 years before this Internet appears.
I am very glad to see that without any Internet pollution I was , as you did too , in state to see the truth. Nobody could lie to me, because I've based my view only on reality facts.
Thanks God that you dare to speak-up the truth !
I think all readers of lewrockwell.com are onboard with -- or at least acknowledge the possibility that -- FDR, Marshall, and others knew specifically -- day and time -- when Pearl Harbor was to be attacked -- see 'Day of Deceit' -- and that the 2,400 who died were a willing (though unexpectedly large) sacrifice.
ReplyDeleteBut, I think fewer know that U.S. companies had managers on the ground in Nazi Germany during the war working at Ford factories. Or, that IBM continued to sell to the Nazis tabulating machines, used to manage logistics, some related to the concentration camps. Or, that U.S. oil companies supplied the Nazis through Portugal. All of these connections later moved from the business world to the O.S.S. and, later, its successor, the C.I.A. And, all of the wartime profits from the above operations were collected at the B.I.S. in Basel, then later repatriated to the U.S.
The U.S. and its secret government -- formed from the system described in Sutton's 'America's Secret Establishment' -- has long shifted the blame for many, many horrible things from itself to others, such as Japan and Hitler. Or, it has created huge, impenetrable (in polite company) smokescreens, such as Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon bombing, 9/11, the Apollo moon landings, and, the granddaddy of them all, The Holocaust.
Thank God for the Internet, and the provision of information outside of controlled channels.
I think the curtain is being drawn on this dark episode of human history -- The Cabal-controlled world -- and that the truth that comes to the fore will be, initially, shocking and sobering, then heartening and empowering.
John G
DeleteThe only meaningful comment I can make is based on the following two cites. First, from “1939 – The War That Had Many Fathers,” by Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof:
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/06/world-war-two-view-from-different-eyes.html
“In the Transition Treaty (Überleitungsvertrag) of 1954, Article 7 (1), it is bindingly laid down that “all judgments (Urteile) from the Nuremberg Trials “remain valid and effective in every regard according to German law and are to be treated accordingly by German courts and authorities.” Included, as an integral part, in the text of the judgments of the main Nuremberg Trial of 1946 is an exactly 200 pages long account of the German war and pre-war history from the perspective of the Soviets, the Americans, the British and the French….this account of “German history” from the victors’ perspective was recognized by the (German) Federal Government as “in all respects valid and effective” (rechtswirksam und rechtskräftig) and thus binding for German courts and authorities.”
When the telling of history is dictated by law, it is certain to be a false history. Truth does not need law to protect it.
Second, from “Advance to Barbarism,” by FJP Veale:
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2014/11/sentence-first-verdict-afterwards.html
The subject is the Nuremberg Trials – the source of German-history-dictated-by-law. I cannot offer a simple summary – if you are interested, read the piece. To make a long story short, the trials were set up for political expediency, with no intent to reach justice, only the intent to minimize friction amongst Stalin (who would have preferred to simply put bullets in the heads of 50,000 German officers, with no more formality than that done during the Great Terror) and Churchill (who felt the British people would never stand for Stalin’s barbaric solution).
I put these two together and conclude: it is safe to hold as a starting point that every “fact” we have been taught about this history is false. This might not be always a good assumption, but I am learning it is right more than not.
Again wrong , very wrong !
DeleteI am not the defendant of Stalin , but the very existence of Germany today was the work of Stalin as long the stupid democratic !!??countries planned to do with all Germans as Stalin does with people from the region of Ukraine ( never a state as you assume today !) or democratic USA killing tens of millions Indians( the native owners of that territory ! )
alternative lies !
DeleteSorry but this is a another injury on the wound of the victims of Jew terror !
I fully agree with both of your conclusions, b-m-.
ReplyDeleteBionic Mosquito,
ReplyDeletefirst of all I would like to see your real name.
quote: "In any event, the institutional beneficiaries of the Terror were not Jews or members of other national minorities but Russians who moved up the ranks."
But how could you explain , that all politrucs and criminal commissars on the front were Jews as your allegation it is true!
How could you explain that at least in one "liberated"country the all leaders as result of "free democratic election" were Stalin's Jews companions until the death of Stalin.
It is crystal clear to me that not only the official history it is be law a grossly falsification , but it is the same within the alternative media when the legend about Jews must be kept !
The ascent of the Russians at very high power's places as you incriminate this population , and you mistaken the periods of chronology , was real after the death of Stalin, not before. Whatsoever you try to say.
My father was in '50 the victim of them.
In other East-European countries occupied by Stalin ( not Russians!) till the death of Stalin , the executive and political power was Jew and not any Jew was in prison for "political"reason. Not any ! Only the big majority was victim of the Jew representatives of Stalin.
mosquito is flying with this one
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pink_Swastika
ReplyDelete“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
― Vladimir Ilich Lenin
Great article B.M. .........Owyhee cowboy
“You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.The fact that the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
ReplyDelete– Alexander Solzhenitsyn