It seems certain of the Central
European countries are not going along with Washington’s desires to isolate
Russia due to the issues in Ukraine.
Some combination of reality and realpolitik has overcome the situation,
even for several members of NATO:
So let’s consider Hungary, a NATO
member whose prime minister recently named Putin’s Russia as a political model
to be emulated. Or NATO member Slovakia, whose leftist prime minister likened
the possible deployment of NATO troops in his country to the Soviet invasion of
1968. Or NATO member Czech Republic, where the defense minister made a similar
comparison and where the government joined Slovakia and Hungary in fighting the
European Union’s sanctions against Russia. Or Serbia, a member of NATO’s
“partnership for peace” that has invited Putin to visit Belgrade this month for
a military parade to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Red Army’s
“liberation” of the city.
That’s three members and one partner. Several of these complaints were registered
early on. What has changed?
Then there is Poland, which until recently
was leading the effort within NATO and the European Union to support Ukraine’s
beleaguered pro-Western government and punish Putin’s aggression.
For many reasons, I consider the critical player in this
match to be Poland: historically, a buffer zone between east and west in Europe
and a
pawn of western powers in the run-up to World War II. Currently a member of NATO, one who
previously led the charge for tough talk and tough actions against Russia.
When Poland was talking tough in this most recent calamity,
I openly
questioned the sanity of their political leadership. Regardless of one’s views on the situation in
Ukraine or the role played by either the Russian or US governments, one look at
a map might suggest to Poland’s political leadership a more tempered position. A consideration of the true value of an
American guarantee might be in order. A
moment’s pause to consider the transitioning relationship between Germany and
Russia could be expected. A
consideration of the different views of Poland’s immediate neighbors might be
wise.
Apparently, times have changed:
This month its new prime minister,
Ewa Kopacz, ordered her new foreign minister to urgently revise its policy. As
the Wall Street Journal reported, she told parliament she was concerned about
“an isolation of Poland” within Europe that could come from setting
“unrealistic goals” in Ukraine.
Some common sense on this topic coming from Poland’s
leadership. Again, whatever one’s view
of the backstory of this conflict, Polish security requires a reality-based
assessment of the situation – not action based on promises from the West that
will prove to be as impossible to keep as were the British and French
guarantees of 1939.
More, from Bloomberg:
“We shouldn’t rush to become part
of this military conflict,” Kopacz said as she presented her cabinet. “When the
big European family decides that we want to help” Ukraine, “then we should take
part in providing help, but together with other countries.”
If actions follow these words, it represents a marked change
from Poland’s previous stand on this issue; it also increases the likelihood of
a calmer, peaceful resolution.
Finally, it continues to develop the possibility for the integration
of Germany toward the east.
The former foreign minister of Poland, Radoslav Sikorski, is very anti-Russian. His American wife, Anne Applebaum, is a Russia scholar and also associated with the American Enterprise Institute. Neocons have hated Putin since he drove out certain oligarchs from Russia
ReplyDeleteWow, great news! I entirely missed this, even though I scan RT, ITAR TASS, and Press TV daily. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteSheepish admission -- jeez, I did not even know that neocon thug Tusk was gone.