I have argued in the
past (for example here,
here,
and here)
that there is no need at all to be concerned about deflation – most certainly not
in monetary policy, secondarily not in commonly measured CPI, and likely not
again in asset prices. The Fed will
inflate until commonly measured CPI reaches politically unacceptable levels –
double digits at least, I suspect.
The Fed will inflate at any time there is any risk of
commonly measured price deflation. The Fed
will buy any asset necessary to meet its objectives. Every hint of credit contraction will be met
with more-than-offsetting inflationary policies. At least until the pain threshold of consumer
prices ends the game.
In a blog
post at the Peterson Institute, Joseph Gagnon
makes my point. In arguing against the
possibility of a “liquidity trap,” Gagnon suggests:
The liquidity trap hypothesis has
some validity, but only if one arbitrarily restricts the definition of monetary
policy to purchases of short-term risk-free bonds. There is no economic reason,
and not even a historical precedent, for such a limited view of monetary
policy.
Unlike Bernanke, Gagnon has no qualms about properly
labeling central bank operations: “Monetary policy consists of printing money
to buy assets.”
Central banks can buy anything, as necessary to support
monetary policy:
Central banks have always held
risky assets, including long-term bonds, loans to banks, gold, and foreign
exchange reserves. Some central banks also hold equity and real estate….There
is no reason to doubt that central bank purchases of equity or real estate
could significantly influence the prices of those assets.
There is no limit in quantity, quality, or type of assets
purchase: auto industry needs a jolt, buy up auto loans; colleges lack funding,
buy up student loans; municipal government bonds lacking support…well, you get
the idea.
The only question is why the major
advanced-economy central banks have been so timid in using their powers and
allowed inflation—and for the United States, employment—to fall below their
targets.
“Timid” is not the word I would use to describe balance sheets
that have tripled in just a few, short years.
Nevertheless, his point is well-taken: central banks will buy whatever
they need to buy, whenever there is a hint of deflation.
Until consumer price inflation wins. That’s when things will become really
interesting.
I guess they were too busy to think of buying Detroit. taxes
ReplyDelete