I learned of the Charlemagne prize when Pope Francis
recently received this honor. Having
recently commented on this occasion and the prize, I only offer here a
brief refresher:
The Charlemagne Prize is one of the
most prestigious European prizes. It has been awarded annually since 1950 by
the German city of Aachen to people who contributed to the ideals upon which it
has been founded.
The sponsors…quote Kurt Pfeiffer:
"the Charlemagne Prize reaches into the future, and at the same time it
embodies an obligation - an obligation of the highest ethical value. It is
directed at a voluntary union of the European peoples without constraint….
A “voluntary union of the European peoples without
constraint.” Kind of the opposite of how
the prize’s namesake went about the consolidation. I suspect the sponsors (and many of the
recipients) hold Charlemagne’s views just slightly under the skin.
I considered an examination of the recipients of this prize;
it is a who’s who of internationalists, integrationists, cultural Marxists,
warmongers and so on. After looking at
the background of the first few names, I concluded that it was pointless to
write such a post. Who did I think would
be awarded? Ron Paul? Murray Rothbard?
Instead, what I found interesting by examining this
background of the recipients was a world of organizations and institutions
previously unknown (or barely known) to me.
This examination will offer some idea of the efforts behind integrating
Europe. You would think that if the
union was truly voluntary they wouldn’t have to work so hard to jam it down
everyone’s throats. So, here goes….
The Bad News
The College of Europe is an
independent university institute of postgraduate European studies with the main
campus in Bruges, Belgium. It was founded in 1949 by such leading European
figures and founding fathers of the European Union as Salvador de Madariaga,
Winston Churchill, Paul-Henri Spaak and Alcide De Gasperi in the wake of the
Hague Congress of 1948 to promote "a spirit of solidarity and mutual
understanding between all the nations of Western Europe and to provide elite
training to individuals who will uphold these values" and "to train
an elite of young executives for Europe."
Students are selected in cooperation with the government of
the student’s home country. For several decades, enrollment was limited to
about 100 students per year, but since the 1990s has increased to over 400.
As you read the following, keep in mind: over 400 of the
best and brightest that Europe and the world has to offer graduate every year from this institution. Thereafter, they work every single day either
directly toward this project or indirectly supportive of it.
According to The Times, the
"College of Europe, in the medieval Belgian city of Bruges, is to the
European political elite what the Harvard Business School is to American
corporate life. It is a hothouse where the ambitious and talented go to make
contacts".
The Economist describes it as
"an elite finishing school for aspiring Eurocrats."
The Financial Times writes that
"the elite College of Europe in Bruges" is "an institution
geared to producing crop after crop of graduates with a lifelong enthusiasm for
EU integration."
The college has also been described
as "the leading place to study European affairs" and as "the
elite training center for the European Union's political class".
RFE/RL has referred to the college
as "a Euro-federalist hot-spot."
The Global Mail has described its
students as "Europe's leaders-in-waiting."
The Council of Europe is an
international organization focused on promoting democracy, rule of law, human
rights, economic development and integration of certain regulatory functions in
Europe. Founded in 1949, it has 47 member states, covers approximately 820
million people and operates with an annual budget of approximately half a
billion Euros.
This is not the European Union (EU). However, all EU member states were first
members of the Council of Europe.
Unlike the EU, the Council of
Europe cannot make binding laws, but it does have the power to enforce select
international agreements reached by European states on various topics.
Being an employee of this organization has its privileges:
The General Agreement on Privileges
and Immunities of the Council of Europe grants the organisation certain
privileges and immunities…. Salaries and emoluments paid by the Council of
Europe to its officials are tax-exempt on the basis of Article 18 of the
General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe.
Do you think any of them want to give that up?
To get some idea of its reach:
The Council of Europe has offices
in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro,
Serbia, and Ukraine; information offices in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan,
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,
Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Slovenia, the Republic
of Macedonia, and Ukraine; and a projects office in Turkey. All these offices
are establishments of the Council of Europe and they share its juridical
personality with privileges and immunities.
The CE works in dozens of areas. Here is a small sample:
Protection of human rights, notably
through:
o
the European Convention on Human Rights
o
the European Committee for the Prevention of
Torture
o
the European Commission against Racism and
Intolerance
o
the Convention on Action against Trafficking in
Human Beings
o
the Convention on the Protection of Children
against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse
o
The Convention on preventing and combating
violence against women and domestic violence.
o
social rights under the European Social Charter
o
linguistic rights under the European Charter for
Regional or Minority Languages
o
minority rights under the Framework Convention
for the Protection of National Minorities
o
Media freedom under Article 10 of the European
Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention on Transfrontier
Television
This organization has at least a dozen entities under it,
for example: the Secretary General, the Committee of Ministers, the
Parliamentary Assembly, The Congress of the Council of Europe, The European
Court of Human Rights, The Commissioner for Human Rights, The Conference of
INGOs.
Honors and Awards
Many of the recipients of the Charlemagne prize have a long
list of such awards and honors. Here is
an example, from Herman
Van Rompuy:
·
Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold (Belgium)
·
Grand Officier of the Légion d'honneur (France)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of St Michael
and St George (United Kingdom)
·
Knight with the Collar of the Order of Pius IX
(Holy See)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Saints
Maurice and Lazarus (Italy)
·
Knight of the Order of the White Eagle (Russian
Empire)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the
Netherlands Lion (Netherlands)
·
Knight of the Order of the Dannebrog (Denmark)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Crown
(Romania)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Christ
(Portugal)
·
Grand Cross of the Order of the Redeemer
(Greece)
·
Grand Cross of the Order of the Oak Crown
(Luxembourg)
·
Order of the Rising Sun, 1st class (Japan)
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Zähringer
Lion (Grand Duchy of Baden)
·
Croix de Guerre (France)
·
Croix de guerre (Belgium)
·
In 2010, he received Collier award of the
Fondation du Mérite européen from Jacques Santer on the occasion of 40th
anniversary of the Fondation for his role as President of the European Council
·
Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Orange-Nassau
(10 October 2014; Netherlands)
·
Gold Medal of the Jean Monnet Foundation for
Europe, in 2014.
·
By Royal Decree of 8 July 2015, Van Rompuy was
ennobled with the personal non-hereditary title of count
I won’t go down the rabbit hole of each award – let’s just
say the people behind each award have some power.
Royalty
Recipients of the Charlemagne prize include royalty.
Juan Carlos reigned as King of
Spain from 1975 to 2014, when he abdicated in favour of his son, Felipe VI.
In 1962, Juan Carlos married
Princess Sofía of Greece and Denmark, with whom he has three children. Juan
Carlos and Sofía retain the titles and style they enjoyed during his reign.
Beatrix reigned as Queen of the
Netherlands from 1980 until her abdication in 2013, after a reign of exactly 33
years. She is the eldest daughter of Queen Juliana and her husband, Prince
Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld. Upon her mother's accession in 1948, she became
heir presumptive. When her mother abdicated on 30 April 1980, Beatrix succeeded
her as queen.
On Koninginnedag (Queen's Day), 30
April 2013, Beatrix abdicated in favour of her eldest son, Willem-Alexander,
and resumed the title of princess. He is the first King of the Netherlands in
123 years.
It is hard to believe that the royalty of Europe play only
the role of figurehead.
The Good News
With all of this firepower, you might think that those who
favor decentralization have no chance – how do we ever overcome all of this?
All of this firepower, and EU leaders have no answers to the
problems that plague Europe: unsustainable national debt in several countries,
with Greece as the poster child; deficits with no end; austerity on the backs
of the citizens in order to prop up the failed banks; never-ending refugees,
relying on Turkey to be the savior; war with Russia in Eastern Europe;
terrorist attacks due to blowback; youth unemployment up to 50%; leaders seen
as puppets to the United States.
These problems and more are growing, not shrinking. Without solutions, people might decide not to
support this monstrosity. We see
evidence every day of this, with backlashes against austerity, open immigration
policies, BREXIT and other similar votes, alternative populist parties and the
like.
Conclusion
Don’t believe me? Ask
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard:
It shows that 60pc of Italians
want a referendum of their own, and that 48pc would now vote to leave the EU…. The
MORI poll shows that 58pc of the French also want their own referendum, and
41pc say they would vote to leave. Swexit sentiment in Sweden is running at
39pc…. It suggests that very large numbers of people on the Continent have
reached their own damning verdict on EU pieties and on the EMU construct
The eurozone’s short-lived
recovery is already losing steam as stimulus fades and deep problems resurface,
raising fears of yet another false dawn and a potential deflation trap if there
is any external shock over coming months.
Italy is running out of economic
time. Seven years into an ageing global
expansion, the country is still stuck in debt-deflation and still grappling
with a banking crisis that it cannot combat within the paralyzing constraints
of monetary union…. Each year Rome hopefully pencils in a fall in the ratio of
public debt to GDP, and each year the ratio rises.
Three commentaries in two days.
Sure, the graduates of the College of Europe might come up
with some more bailing wire and duct tape, but such solutions cannot solve the
most fundamental problem of the EU: central planning and control doesn’t work
for the masses; eventually it falls under its own weight. It will in Europe.
Call it the revenge of the
Stellinga.
I can hear the people sing, singing a song of angry men
ReplyDeleteIt is the music of a people who will not be slaves again!
Maybe this time it'll work out better. Hard to beat the original soundtrack, though.
Hopefully Europe finds its own Gorbachev when this all falls apart....
DeleteGorby has never been adequately appreciated, I think. The seen / unseen in action. What you saw was rapid decay and disassociation. What you didn't see was a spasm of nuclear death.
DeleteThe EU has always been a program to create a European super state. However this did not fly very well with the European public so they started by pretending that they were trade and economic organization. Since economics is such a large part of life they used economic policy to push the superstate idea.
ReplyDeleteA big problem is that they make decisions on the economy not on economic ideas but on political ideas.
For example that is why they allowed Greece to join the Euro, they knew that the Greek economy was filled with fraud and fake book keeping. But the EU wanted to increase it political power and so they let the Greeks into the Euro.
The same with Ukraine, its an economic basket case, making an Association Agreement with it made no economic sense for either Ukraine or EU since neither have the money to spend to implement the "reforms" that the Association Agreement demands.
As long as they keep making economic decisions based not on economics but the policy of increasing EU power then they will continue to make bad economic decisions.
The problem with the EU is not bad economic policies or decisions, all of which are temporary and can be easily reversed, but the reality that the EU is an anti-European project that seeks to disinherit the indigenous peoples of Europe.
Delete