tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post6144367916230455907..comments2024-03-28T09:59:13.754-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: Roosevelt’s BFF “Uncle Joe”bionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-39327199804520333322012-05-06T18:25:40.585-07:002012-05-06T18:25:40.585-07:00Call it TGWOTF, or the elite, or the oligarchs...c...Call it TGWOTF, or the elite, or the oligarchs...certainly there is an innermost circle - presidents and prime ministers are servants of these.<br /><br />My speculation is that bringing the German and Japanese middle class under the tent to be exploited was far more valuable to the money elite than bringing the Russian middle class (of which there wasn't much of one in any case by this time).<br /><br />The Germans and Japanese would not become subservient via treaty – why would the local oligarchs give away such power to the international oligarchs? So events were engineered to bring them in by force.<br /><br />After WWI, Britain quit its alliance with Japan. On the surface, this makes little sense – the Japanese were great partners to watch over British interests in the western Pacific. But having Japan as a partner was not as valuable to the elite as having Japan as a servant. In WWII, Churchill did all in his power to bring the U.S. into conflict with Japan and Germany, and he had a willing ally in Roosevelt – who only needed time to engineer the cause to enter.<br /><br />The result was incorporation of two of the most productive societies in the history of the modern world into the fold of money power. These elites gained far more by fighting Germany (and Japan) and bringing them onto the plantation than they would have by incorporating the Russians, or further, ignoring the whole thing.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-27434806289803574112012-05-06T14:33:38.386-07:002012-05-06T14:33:38.386-07:00I am not going to try and verify everything here, ...I am not going to try and verify everything here, but here is my take.<br /><br />Hitler had wandered off the reservation. He was the target of "The Guys Who Own The Fed" (TGWOTF refers to the families who own the Federal Reserve and other central banks). They supported and empowered Hitler which is pretty standard procedure for them. They create new enemies to start new wars to consolidate ever more wealth and power. Like Kennedy, Saddam Hussein, Noriega, Muammar Gaddafi, Hitler was not following the plan. He had things to say like this from Mein Kampf: "The struggle against international finance capital and loan capital has become one of the most important points in the program on which the German nation has based its fight for economic freedom and independence."<br />Mein Kampf (My Stuggle) to free Germany from foreign capitalists and usury.<br /><br />To me WWII only makes sense from the perspective of Germany attempting to free itself from the control of TGWOTF. The American republic is being conquered by the same money cartels but not enough people can recognize it. <br /><br />Bolshevik revolution was financed with 50 million in gold from TGWOTF as well. I don't know how much control remained over Stalin, but Germany apparently was considered the more dangerous to their economic hegemony over most of the planet. Stalin was needed to destroy Germany. Communism was a promising future enemy. <br /><br />We have had two presidents named Roosevelt. That doesn't happen unless you are in the club with TGWOTF. The U.S has been ruled pretty much by TGWOTF since 1913. Japan was bullied by Roosevelt into attacking the U.S. to get us into the war against the main target Germany. Americans were overwhelmingly against involvement in another war in Europe after only 20 years. We had no reason to fight in WWI but that is another story.<br /> <br />For Roosevelt another purpose was to distract Japan's attention away Russia allowing Stalin to focus attention on fighting Germany. Hitler invaded Russia because he knew what communism is just a banker tool of contol, and because Germany desparately needed a supply of oil. Rommel failed in North Africa.<br /><br />As you have pointed out Roosevelt's decisions make no sense unless you consider who really was making them. He was not insane.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-19938786395199201082012-05-05T19:06:28.086-07:002012-05-05T19:06:28.086-07:00Paul: There is a third, possible, reason: Roosevel...Paul: There is a third, possible, reason: Roosevelt was insane.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity <br /><br />Wikipedia: Insanity, craziness or madness is a spectrum of behaviors characterized by certain abnormal mental or behavioral patterns. Insanity may manifest as violations of societal norms, including a person becoming a danger to themselves or others, though not all such acts are considered insanity. In modern usage insanity is most commonly encountered as an informal unscientific term denoting mental instability, or in the narrow legal context of the insanity defense.<br /><br /><br />It is an interesting question: Does power cause insanity, or does insanity look for an outlet in (or seek) power? It is said that “normal” people do not desire or seek the awesome power that comes with the Presidency – it is not “normal” for most people to want such direct control over the lives (and potentially deaths) of hundreds of millions if not billions. <br /><br />Richard: Sure, insanity could be used to explain anything evil, but sometimes, evil happens for logical reasons, not insane ones.<br /><br />This, of course, is the problem. Every tyranny in history could be explained away by saying the tyrant was insane. To de-Americanize this, could it not be said Hitler or Stalin was insane? <br /><br />Certainly, I imagine it is possible that Roosevelt was insane. However, I find it hard to believe that the real power behind the office would want an insane person in the role. Insane means unpredictable. They would prefer someone whose actions can be managed and directed, or who will, through his own accord, act in the manner desired.<br /><br />If Roosevelt was acting in a manner outside of the bounds of those who wanted and kept him in power, they would have reined him in. Not like this has never happened.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-65983633564555738012012-05-05T15:35:53.188-07:002012-05-05T15:35:53.188-07:00@Paul, I think insanity is often the explanation o...@Paul, I think insanity is often the explanation offered by those who tacitly favor the political policy but oppose the actor on a personal basis - wishing merely to change the historical details, not the outcome.<br /><br />Sure, insanity could be used to explain anything evil, but sometimes, evil happens for logical reasons, not insane ones.Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16192630129745886988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-50455407973927718092012-05-05T09:50:11.261-07:002012-05-05T09:50:11.261-07:00There is a third, possible, reason: Roosevelt was...There is a third, possible, reason: Roosevelt was insane. Recent research has concluded that holding power over other people causes changes in the brain similar to the ones caused by cocaine ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2136547/Power-really-does-corrupt-scientists-claim-addictive-cocaine.html ). It can be argued that FDR's power led to a power-lust/addiction which in turn led to him making some horrendous choices, based upon delusions of grandeur, a gross underestimation of the risks, and a complete lack of empathy for the people of Europe and Russia. In short, Stalin may have just played to FDR's ego, and FDR, addled by his power-lust, saw himself and Stalin as true saviors of the world. FDR may have been completely blind to the horrors right in front of his nose, simply by his power addiction.PaulTheCabDriverhttp://www.paulstaxi.comnoreply@blogger.com