tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post4378242421712829519..comments2024-03-28T09:59:13.754-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: Sloppy Language Results in Sloppy Thinkingbionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger36125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-18188370377050560862017-04-04T05:59:48.157-07:002017-04-04T05:59:48.157-07:00Me: Chinese ppl are generally shorter than whites
...Me: Chinese ppl are generally shorter than whites<br />Jack: no way look at Yao Ming<br />Me: (face palm)<br /><br />Me: Blacks are generally more athletic than whites.<br />Jack: nah, look at the NHL<br />Me: (face palm)<br /><br />Come on man, did all races equally come up with property rights? Stop being afraid of making what are painfully obvious observations<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17703850449424174622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-78959124316503150702017-04-03T10:56:44.459-07:002017-04-03T10:56:44.459-07:00FM:
"At the bottom its property law. Here it...FM:<br /> "At the bottom its property law. Here it is, (meta) White Culture!!= likes to plan, it demands respect for its things (This isn't to say having lots of things is of all importance) it keeps its stuff/life together, etc, all of this stuff builds security and a knowable future!<br />eir will."<br /><br />Whites created largest state in the history of the world, virtually constantly at war with some people somewhere throughout its history, presently with military boots in over 100 countries, and a quasi-police state on much of its citizens. That’s far from protecting property law in any meaningful sense.Jackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18259730262288807964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-23557241879095642722017-04-03T01:37:51.919-07:002017-04-03T01:37:51.919-07:00Maybe off topic but Learned Hand's quote came ...Maybe off topic but Learned Hand's quote came to mind. "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it…" Open borders libertarians are fooling themselves if they believe that bringing in an unlimited amount of people, most of whom are anti-liberty, will not result is less liberty. What will stop them from further diminishing our remaining liberties? If you don't stop them at the border, you won't stop them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-72222664963371392882017-04-03T01:31:13.366-07:002017-04-03T01:31:13.366-07:00Mosin,
I'll come out an say it. On net, the i...Mosin,<br /><br />I'll come out an say it. On net, the immigrants of the late 19th and early 20th century, were a negative. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-85968882762250757202017-04-02T22:02:19.338-07:002017-04-02T22:02:19.338-07:00Amen mein bruder.Amen mein bruder.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-76947833876486704302017-04-02T19:00:01.691-07:002017-04-02T19:00:01.691-07:00error...probably subconsciously, as the meaning sh...error...probably subconsciously, as the meaning should be clear.<br /><br />"The larger portion of the libertine movement..."<br /><br />bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-9561924352674594132017-04-02T18:58:08.937-07:002017-04-02T18:58:08.937-07:00“I appreciate you letting me comment here.”
You h...“I appreciate you letting me comment here.”<br /><br />You have always been civil, and your comments are thought-provoking.<br /><br />“I do however believe that to fight the Diseased Order as a libertarian is to do it with one hand tied behind your back. But hey, I am open to being proved wrong.”<br /><br />Inherently this is right, so it won’t be me proving you wrong. The larger portion of the libertine movement feeds right into the Diseased Order (if I understand the meaning of your term).<br /><br />I will add further, it will take more than one “skill” to fight this Diseased Order; properly understood and applied libertarian theory will have a role. But all of life is not answered by this theory. More importantly, we will never live on earth with humans under anything coming close to resembling the silver rule.<br /><br />Romans 12: 4 For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, 5 so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others. 6 We have different gifts, according to the grace given to each of us. If your gift is prophesying, then prophesy in accordance with your faith; 7 if it is serving, then serve; if it is teaching, then teach; 8 if it is to encourage, then give encouragement; if it is giving, then give generously; if it is to lead, do it diligently; if it is to show mercy, do it cheerfully.<br /><br />But what if the Diseased Order is multi-generational, dating back centuries – even millennia? An earthly power cannot achieve such a feat. I will suggest, in this case, that no human power will defeat it.<br /><br />Ephesians 6: 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.<br /><br />In this case, both you and I will need some help!<br />bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-90244091477131976462017-04-02T12:07:18.530-07:002017-04-02T12:07:18.530-07:00I appreciate you letting me comment here.
Underst...I appreciate you letting me comment here.<br /><br />Understanding is more important to me than agreement. Because my views lie (far) outside what Tom Woods calls "the 3x5 card of allowable opinion" a lot of people don't actually understand them, having never been presented with them.<br /><br />I told you at the very beginning my goal was to be an ambassador for my ideological perspective. That is my only purpose. I am not a missionary. But I do want to put pressure on libertarian ideologues (I mean that term in a neutral sense) to see if their ideology can confront the existential problems of the age. On this account I have been pleasantly surprised by the willingness of some you to jump into the deep waters of the kulturkampf.<br /><br />I do however believe that to fight the Diseased Order as a libertarian is to do it with one hand tied behind your back. But hey, I am open to being proved wrong.<br /><br />Thank you BM, an honest man is hard to find.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-46409212098780649832017-04-01T21:26:23.445-07:002017-04-01T21:26:23.445-07:00Mosil: everything you asked for regarding culture,...Mosil: everything you asked for regarding culture, I answered thoroughly as I possibly could. I went out of my way to not offend. What did I say specifically that you disagree with and why, I truly want to hear a response. <br />"Scary" yes it is scary. Speaking in RealTalk is scary. The circumstances are not my fault. Engage or you lose and you can leave as a coward. <br />Pretend I'm a minority if it helps!! <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17703850449424174622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-23104727595300831092017-04-01T18:38:48.000-07:002017-04-01T18:38:48.000-07:00UC, your positions are clear. When I think back t...UC, your positions are clear. When I think back to our earliest dialogue and my views, I consider the following:<br /><br />1) I have grown to believe the cultural soil is the precondition to achieving and maintaining a reasonably libertarian order. This I consider a significant event in my intellectual journey.<br /><br />2) Too many libertarians too often can think no further than chanting NAP, NAP.<br /><br />Our dialogue has most certainly contributed to this.<br /><br />I am certain there are some places where I will never come into agreement with your views; I suspect it might have to do with my views of an afterlife. <br /><br />In any case, I appreciate your contributions here.<br /><br />bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-26841986649637200862017-04-01T18:31:18.494-07:002017-04-01T18:31:18.494-07:00"Ciao."
Is this a promise?"Ciao."<br /><br />Is this a promise?bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-44915485510448478832017-04-01T18:08:54.391-07:002017-04-01T18:08:54.391-07:00Bionic--
You really live in some fantastical past...Bionic--<br /><br />You really live in some fantastical past. If you were to have traveled outside your regional comfort zone, you would know that Europe hasn't been Christian for sixty plus years, maybe longer. And with any Kiznerian action knowledge, you would know that the current of the day's evil has its source in Europe. By the way, how many millions died due to that flow of thought?<br /><br />Do you realize your doppelganger from a century ago said the very same about my Catholic grandparents, shouting , "No hunkies allowed," alongside Martha Sanger?<br /><br />By the way, Finn is one scary dude. Deep down, I think you might be as well. I do believe I'll let you all waller in your hate. Ciao.<br />Jim Fedakohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17052806627314964160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-38995266714111138232017-04-01T16:40:08.669-07:002017-04-01T16:40:08.669-07:00BM,
In my above post I mentioned how it takes us ...BM,<br /><br />In my above post I mentioned how it takes us back to the "beginning." I was referring to a dialogue we had almost exactly one year ago.<br /><br />Found here: http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-preconditions.html<br /><br />I enjoyed re-reading the comments on this and maybe you would too. I think now that you understand my position better you may pick up on some things you missed before since it will easier to read between the lines.<br /><br />I was not being dishonest or disingenuous but I was definitely trying to package my arguments in the most libertarian way possible. I don't bother to do that anymore. Not because I don't sympathize with some libertarians like Nick B and yourself, but because its not *my* frame.<br /><br />Similarly, re-reading the Hornberger saga is also amusing.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-59065628972920401302017-04-01T14:55:44.151-07:002017-04-01T14:55:44.151-07:00Don't worry we'll all be one Big Ghetto...Don't worry we'll all be one Big Ghetto'ed Hip Hop Third World Family in less than a generation.<br /><br />When you introduce a non sophisticated populous (generally speaking), don't want to offend anybody...coupled to a European Egalitarian system (Welfare all State Intervention), you have the beginning of the End taking place. I see it where I am...just 25 years...and especially in the last 10 to 15. <br /><br />The Elite are bringing in the Shock Troops to destroy the Liberal Order or somewhat adherence to Property Rights that European Immigrants generally accepted. They want Dominion over Earth and beyond if possible. Pretty devious bunch, and quite unassuming in their approach...No Godzilla breathing fire on Tokyo...sometimes more on the lines of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-87470526942128999092017-04-01T10:53:04.814-07:002017-04-01T10:53:04.814-07:00FM,
[Isn't property the ultimate illiberal(in...FM,<br /><br />[Isn't property the ultimate illiberal(in the context u use it) law? It gives the right to all people to exclude. Could this be for the same reason they hate nationalism?]<br /><br />Yes. Exactly right. If property exclusively is allowed to determine the social order you will end up very quickly with a quasi-feudal society. It will be extremely hierarchical and not amenable to people like Sheldon Richman or Charles Johnson.<br /><br />This has been my thesis regarding Hoppe. He started taking libertarianism away from its classical liberal roots to a more "illiberal" direction- to save it from itself. Its no coincidence his book spends the first half or so explaining why monarchy and feudalism are better than democracy LOL.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-62142002571869087632017-04-01T10:43:53.721-07:002017-04-01T10:43:53.721-07:00Mosin,
I don't care for Norman Rockwell. I mu...Mosin,<br /><br />I don't care for Norman Rockwell. I much prefer neo-classical pillars adorned with spinning crosses and Roman eagles that the imperial legions march between on their way to great the glorious leader- who will salute them from a balcony before giving a moving speech about the ETERNAL GLORY of the NATION. All set to Wagner.<br /><br />Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-83895432955253778722017-04-01T10:13:06.571-07:002017-04-01T10:13:06.571-07:00FM, regarding Gramsci I have written one significa...FM, regarding Gramsci I have written one significant piece; you can decide if it is "essential" :-) <br /><br />http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2015/07/antonio-gramsci-libertarians.html <br /><br />Marx went after property; Gramsci thought the way to spread communism was by attacking culture. The "Cultural Marxists" are actually Cultural Gramscists. bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-33212039220903819982017-04-01T10:07:14.147-07:002017-04-01T10:07:14.147-07:00Generally not Christian, generally not from Europe...Generally not Christian, generally not from Europe.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-936138403340343842017-04-01T08:17:41.911-07:002017-04-01T08:17:41.911-07:00He has a twitter account, with a tweet on this art...He has a twitter account, with a tweet on this article that can be reply tweeted:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/jacobhornberger?lang=enJackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18259730262288807964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-38909118343932786292017-04-01T06:33:05.704-07:002017-04-01T06:33:05.704-07:00Mosil: I asked you before, but you didn't answ...Mosil: I asked you before, but you didn't answer, so I'll ask again:<br />If all US whites of European descent stopped having babies today and the population total was replaced by immigrants and minority births, what would the US look like in 80 years? Does that matter to you? Do u think I shouldn't care? These are basically just anthropological questions at this point.<br /><br />This is the despicable part:<br /> "Is it defined by the SJW movement alternatively protesting in the streets and seeking safe spaces? What about the insidious supporters of the welfare state? What about the progressives who know how you should live your life better than you? Or is it defined by the bloodlust of neocon and conservative warmongers?"<br />Every group you listed is openly preach/taught to think negatively about white people and especially white men. We are the only interest group that is an unthought. I don't even want an interest group!!! <br />You can not make every ethnic group have a political interest group, that magically align!,(Bionic, do you have an essential Gramsci reading?) and put it at war with the only non-political undefined interest group, whites. They are manipulating these people against whites!!! <br />So why do democrat/progressive/leftist hate whites, or really white culture? Or whiteness <br /><br />I think this is where UC will disagree. At the bottom its property law. Here it is, (meta) White Culture!!= likes to plan, it demands respect for its things (This isn't to say having lots of things is of all importance) it keeps its stuff/life together, etc, all of this stuff builds security and a knowable future! <br />So it/culture made property law!! (Or nah, property law is dumb and bad, the people should fight, I mean hand out all the stuff because we have politicians that are fare and are smarter than us) <br />At the bottom of that contract is a declaration by Law that it is yours. It protects you from everyone around you. I think this is why the left hates whites, but they hate property first, they hate the exclusion of their will. <br /><br />I want to be clear, white or Western European culture developed property law to suit its purposes. You lose Mosil if you don't respond. (I don't think you can remain obtuse on this issue anymore) I want this fight bc I don't think I cant lose, prove me wrong!! Property is exclusionary, that is what they hate, it excludes their will materially, in this world. If the whites are shamed and driven into the ground, I see no upper limit to their "will" being imposed. North Korea comes to mind.<br /><br />Mosil, please try not to get triggered, stop and think. It isn't a fundamental fact of reality that only whites live like this, obviously, but as long as the left has these ppl under its spell(possessed) everyone will suffer (for hating whites, it's history, and it's property law). But I'm willing to make it a racial argument, I would live in an all white country to exclude this demonic left. If they don't stop, secession is the next step, I honestly think it is inevitable now.<br /><br />UC: Isn't property the ultimate illiberal(in the context u use it) law? It gives the right to all people to exclude. Could this be for the same reason they hate nationalism? <br />"It excludes us from there will" Take that exclusion down to the individual, there is no reason a nation wouldn't exist. I think it would be the strongest ever and exist potentially for a very long time<br /><br />Thoughts anyone? <br /><br />PS: Sorry Bionic, I had to repost this to fix the typosAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17703850449424174622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-18364039635988250912017-04-01T06:09:56.389-07:002017-04-01T06:09:56.389-07:00What "characteristics common to the general p...What "characteristics common to the general population" do immigrants of the last fifty years lack?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-79389209137541078782017-04-01T05:55:54.084-07:002017-04-01T05:55:54.084-07:00Unhappy --
I realize you pine for the halcyon day...Unhappy --<br /><br />I realize you pine for the halcyon days of Normanew Rockwell, as does Bionic. Yet those days existed only in paintings. <br /><br />Ignored is any realization that the genesis of the demise of "the gold old days" is homegrown. Even the hallowed heaths and heathers of Great Britain have fallen. So the stock itself is not healthy, rotting at the root.<br /><br />I suggest you read the Bionics of 100 years ago to see that the very same he says today was said of my ancestors. Yet he now claims those migrations were good.<br /><br />Be like Bionic, give up your liberties to the state in defense of a past that never existed, except in Bionic's lazy dreams on cold spring days.<br /><br />With each intervention, the state will say, "It's all for our eternal nation." And you will cheer, all in the name of liberty.<br /><br />Jim Fedakohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17052806627314964160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-61579402804193886102017-04-01T05:24:06.356-07:002017-04-01T05:24:06.356-07:00"..in the end, some "entity" must b..."..in the end, some "entity" must be strong enough to defend the property it owns or is otherwise obligated to defend.."<br /><br />You may be interested in some examples of that concept which I just found, that of the Prairie Banditti><br /><br />Short but very informative read here.:<br /><br />http://genealogytrails.com/ill/ogle/banditti.html<br /><br />jacques sheetenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-31813867471125451742017-03-31T21:20:48.772-07:002017-03-31T21:20:48.772-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17703850449424174622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-6410548251226413922017-03-31T20:35:30.530-07:002017-03-31T20:35:30.530-07:00No, it just means that they don't believe the ...No, it just means that they don't believe the state has any business telling anyone where they can live or for whom they can work -- or for that matter, whom they may invite on their own property, to whom they may sell or rent their own property, or whom they may employ.<br /><br />If the United State can tell Jose that he's not allowed to live in a certain region, regardless of what peaceful arrangements he may make, it can do the same to you or me.Kevin S. Van Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591228017757297031noreply@blogger.com