tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post2057081569125426228..comments2024-03-28T09:59:13.754-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: With Friends Like These…bionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-12094175386837958392016-01-25T18:17:17.058-08:002016-01-25T18:17:17.058-08:00What is the difference between a limited liability...What is the difference between a limited liability corporation and a tribe? Both are voluntary associations of people. If a corporation can own property, why not a tribe?Historianhttp://www.libertyhollow.weebly.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-85047706131751241192016-01-25T10:03:35.841-08:002016-01-25T10:03:35.841-08:00If the nomads could no longer use the land for nom...If the nomads could no longer use the land for nomading that they previously did, it sure seems it approaches denying them usage the same as stealing it would.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-15370926092222040212015-05-15T14:30:16.566-07:002015-05-15T14:30:16.566-07:00I do not claim to be an expert or scholar on this ...I do not claim to be an expert or scholar on this matter; however many Indian tribes / cultures had a very different concept of "own" than did the Europeans. <br /><br />What does land ownership mean to nomadic tribes? I cannot say in any terms that make sense, however I suspect from the Indian point of view, their land was taken (in those cases where guns and violence where used).bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-68332224461847281792015-05-15T14:12:15.628-07:002015-05-15T14:12:15.628-07:00CATO is wrong and this is sad.
A small aside...w...CATO is wrong and this is sad. <br /><br />A small aside...we didn't "take" land from the Indians, at least as the idea is almost always articulated. The tribes didn't own the land, simply because they ranged over it like nomads or hunters. And they often stole from and murdered members of other tribes, driving them by force from "their land". <br /><br />The US military did, however, steal land from Indian farmers, where fixed settlements, houses and fields had been built. That is a distinction worth noting is it not?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-4100146858199285602013-06-16T04:51:39.778-07:002013-06-16T04:51:39.778-07:00I have long suspected that CATO was “pay to play” ...I have long suspected that CATO was “pay to play” advocates and would support anything as long as it paid. I wonder what the NSA paid for this? If NSA did not pay for it and this is the real opinion of the authors then they have no concept of liberty or the Constitution.<br /><br />[quote]It has been free of political abuse since its inception.[/quote]<br />Just like the IRS and for the same reasons, the public is rarely allowed to see what is happening because its behind a wall of secrecy<br /><br />The CATO article is almost as pathetic as the time that National Review Online put out an article defending Trotsky using the same reasoning, mistakes were made but all in a good cause..<br /><br />http://www.nationalreview.com/content/trotskycons<br />DJFnoreply@blogger.com