tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post2050783086679670210..comments2024-03-28T09:59:13.754-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: It’s the Jooz bionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-18169238456095107812016-04-25T14:02:45.195-07:002016-04-25T14:02:45.195-07:00The context of the rise of Fascism and later Nazis...The context of the rise of Fascism and later Nazism is that many people in Europe believed that Jews would lead a Communist takeover in Europe. Even Winston Churchill wrote an essay about how the Communist Jews took over Russia. There were Communist Jewish revolutionary leaders in Germany and also the bloody revolution of Bela Kun in Hungary. Conservative Europeans supported Fascism and later Nazism as a reaction to the perceived threat from Communist Jews.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-21371551590453914282016-04-07T03:04:56.894-07:002016-04-07T03:04:56.894-07:00No, I am not Dr. Gordon.No, I am not Dr. Gordon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-62127586956585862092016-04-05T18:43:23.516-07:002016-04-05T18:43:23.516-07:00Is this by chance Dr. David Gordon?
I didn't ...Is this by chance Dr. David Gordon?<br /><br />I didn't think much of it at first but upon second glance this comment bears the hallmarks of the infamous intellectual assassin himself.<br /><br />If this is Dr. Gordon, or if you are reading this, please consider doing a review of Dr. MacDonald's book. I am confident that you would give it a fair treatment unlike the garbage review from Ilana Mercer.<br /><br />If I am wrong, please forgive me Anon, but you should take it as compliment that I mistook you for Dr. Gordon.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-84674543518961677992016-04-05T12:57:12.074-07:002016-04-05T12:57:12.074-07:00These are the kind of neighbors you pray for. I...These are the kind of neighbors you pray for. I've lived among 'em as do my in-laws currently. Great family value stuff, great playmates for the grandkids. Not be teachin 'em to smoke crack haha.Capn Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08133441332228302495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-58381418026784949432016-04-05T11:49:51.921-07:002016-04-05T11:49:51.921-07:00One last thought after reading your exchange with ...One last thought after reading your exchange with Matt-<br /><br />You wrote, "regarding the two examples of organized Jewish power that you offer, overall a negative contribution to the peace of the world. Miserable to the Palestinians both during the Mandate and since."<br /><br />While I don't disagree with that I was referring more to the type of argument Matt is making, which I endorse. The problem is not, is Zionism bad for Palestinian non-Jews (obviously it is), but is it bad for the U.S and Europe? The answer is of course yes.<br /><br />My point is that you are risking downplaying the significance of this issue, and I think you do this because you are approaching these questions from a consistent methodological individualism. Regardless, I appreciate the exchange and I am sure you have some awareness of a how taboo this subject is. The reason why it is so taboo contains within it part of the answer.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-50943238700034553522016-04-05T11:27:02.957-07:002016-04-05T11:27:02.957-07:00Even if you employ methodological individualism in...Even if you employ methodological individualism in analyzing human action it does not negate the fact the individuals act to forward the interests of groups which they themselves belong too. If you want to take the Max Stirner approach of full egoism, you can still say that if people value the success of a certain group and act to forward it then it is indistinguishable from their individual goals.<br /><br />When I first studied Mises it took some time before I was willing to accept his axiom completely. I had the crude idea that he was referring to financial profit when he talked about profit. But as you know its about acting to arrive at a situation preferable to the situation that you start from. The specific preference is up for question.<br /><br />The mistake I believe you gents are making is this: you are unwilling to get into the weeds of the reality of human behavior and are stuck on an idealized view of human behavior (rational man). All libertarians would benefit from reading up on human biodiversity (humanbiodiversity.com) and group evolutionary psychology. If we know a priori what to expect from certain classes of people then we are much better equipped to understand what is going on around us.<br /><br />Hans Herman Hoppe understands this which is why he invites geneticists to his Property and Freedom Society.<br /><br />Do you think Misesean Economics is going to help you to understand a below 80 IQ jungle person who doesn't even have a concept of time? Would it not be better to try and understand this human like you would a dog?<br /><br />"each individual acts individually."<br /><br />This presupposes an unfettered freewill and doesn't take into account arguments from biological determinism. If you want your statement to be correct you would need to re-frame it as "individuals appear to act individually."<br />UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-68710212755041041752016-04-05T11:07:42.933-07:002016-04-05T11:07:42.933-07:00Yeah. Stalin pretty much killed anything that move...Yeah. Stalin pretty much killed anything that moved.Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-80219305956299253912016-04-05T05:29:14.292-07:002016-04-05T05:29:14.292-07:00I have an ID on Disqus but that's not availabl...I have an ID on Disqus but that's not available, hence anonymous<br /><br />Though most American Jews are assimilating into the American fabric, as have many European groups, there are always, in every group, those who hold doggedly to the old ways. <br /><br />A growing community of Orthodox Jews -- this group called the haredim -- have recently been attracted to a neighborhood across town. There are efforts, even petitions, to keep them out. This is not because of anti-semitism so much as it's due to a wariness, extended to similar groups, of those who who heavily access public benefits. <br /><br />These haredim are marginally poor.The men, in their traditional garb, spend many hours studying their Scriptures. The women, in their traditional garb, shepherd a passel of children. (A number of these folks are liberal, college educated American Jews who've "gone back to the land of Zion in the Sky" so to speak, though I don't mean to disparage. The girls ride their bicycles in their long skirts. The boys play catch with tennis balls in their long side curls and skull caps. The families live on, and qualify for, Food Stamps and other government emoluments. Most of these kids will grow up to be shopkeepers and will work either in manual trades, in the kosher food business or in some line of retail. From today's perspective, they're anachronisms, longing, heaven knows why, for the amenities of a ghetto existence in pre-Holocaust Warsaw and Crackow.<br /><br />Yet these are the folks whom many educated and less than educated people fear will one day rise from their rental units, reveal their hidden wealth like Superman's S beneath his white shirt and tie, then step forth and rule the world!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-26248492473487805072016-04-04T20:08:19.320-07:002016-04-04T20:08:19.320-07:00"But you refuse to answer the question or dea..."But you refuse to answer the question or deal with what I have presented".<br /><br />I don't know how to question or deal with it. You made a very broad assertion involving wonkish geo-political strategy, in two very short paragraphs. <br /><br />In any event, to the extent that I can attempt to understand what you are saying, I disagree with you. Almost all US foreign policy results from domestic considerations, not geopolitical strategy, in my opinion.Matt@Occidentalism.orghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02395220402283030311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-16087266069963810852016-04-04T18:44:37.656-07:002016-04-04T18:44:37.656-07:00Whether you are convinced or not is not very impor...Whether you are convinced or not is not very important in the grand scheme of things.<br /><br />But you refuse to answer the question or deal with what I have presented.<br /><br />Instead you reply as if a foreign-state-sympathetic lobbying organization in Washington is necessary to motivate the war-machine to action. bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-76198830434636712612016-04-04T18:07:30.014-07:002016-04-04T18:07:30.014-07:00I guess AIPAC isn't necessary since the US gov...I guess AIPAC isn't necessary since the US government would support Israel in the Middle East anyway because Russia and China.<br /><br />Not convinced.<br /><br />Matt@Occidentalism.orghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02395220402283030311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-68615957324815013132016-04-04T17:58:20.376-07:002016-04-04T17:58:20.376-07:00“I wish that you had dealt more substantially with...“I wish that you had dealt more substantially with my rather long post.”<br /><br />Your subject post was 360 words long. My direct reply to you was 261 words long; if you add the conclusion – summarizing my thoughts for you and unhappy – the total is 415 words.<br /><br />As my generosity of writing even more words than you did in response to your post AND creating an entirely new blog post such that the dialogue does not get lost goes unappreciated by you, I will not be nearly as generous this time.<br /><br />“The Israel as pawn theme is something that I have heard before, and indeed, it makes sense. Surely the smaller state should be the client state, right?”<br /><br />My view has nothing to do with Israel being the smaller state.<br /><br />“There is not one single advantage to this 'alliance' with Israel and Israel is a major headache for the USA.”<br /><br />An excuse to surround Russia on the southwest; an excuse to involve itself in territory that is important for access to and control of the sub-continent – thereby surrounding Russia and central China. <br /><br />My theory also explains Vietnam, Korea, staying in Japan, staying in Germany, Taiwan, the Philippines, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and expanding NATO to the borders of Russia – in other words, virtually every intervention by the US in over 100 years (and Britain’s interventions even longer, to include Singapore, Hong Kong and the coast of China, and others): all to surround Russia and central China. Does yours?<br />bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-27962370455371729652016-04-04T17:15:45.258-07:002016-04-04T17:15:45.258-07:00I wish that you had dealt more substantially with ...I wish that you had dealt more substantially with my rather long post. After all you did write "America sends tons of money and forgives loans many other places as well". I demonstrated that while America does send some small amounts of money to other places, the overwhelming majority of that money goes to Israel or on behalf of Israel. "Tons" of money is not going anywhere except to Israel or for Israel. If I have changed your worldview then that should at least be acknowledged.<br /><br />If you title your post "its the Jooz" it suggests that you are not going to give your interlocutors due consideration. My view on "the Jooz" is virtually the same as Murray Rothbard, who I hear is an anti-semite.<br /><br />The Israel as pawn theme is something that I have heard before, and indeed, it makes sense. Surely the smaller state should be the client state, right? But that doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Unlike what the media tells you, Israel is not an allied state of the USA, but receives protection as if an ally. Israel is not obligated to help the USA, and in fact doesn't help the USA. There is not one single advantage to this 'alliance' with Israel and Israel is a major headache for the USA. So the reasons for the 'alliance' are entirely domestic.<br /><br />Now, as to individuals. Human action is one of those axiomatic things, but it also accounts for cooperation. Unless you are looking at the managerial state and managerialism you are missing a huge part of the picture. The managerial state also manifests itself in the private sector.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managerial_state<br /><br />Yes, every single person is an individual person, but Jewish people have a very high degree of ethnocentrism that is hard for the average white person to understand. Take a look at Harvard. Jews are relatively high IQ, but they are not so high IQ that Jews could possibly be 25% of the student body. Grades indicate that Jews should be about 6% of Harvard. So what is happening here? The Jewish administrators of Harvard are discriminating against non-Jewish whites and Asians, in favor of their fellow Jews. There are less non-Jewish whites in Harvard than Jews. Number of Asians is negligible compared to how many there would be under a meritocratic system. Anti-semite (like Rothbard) Ron Unz has written extensively on this matter.<br /><br />Now I don't think it is necessary to mention "the Jooz" as much as David Duke, but they are a factor. The truth is that you can criticize all kinds of people, Blacks, native Americans, Latinos, etc, but not Jews. That's called Jewish power. Ask Rick Sanchez.Matt@Occidentalism.orghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02395220402283030311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-77968009540192143192016-04-04T16:15:02.664-07:002016-04-04T16:15:02.664-07:00That would be great. Paul Gottfried, himself Jewi...That would be great. Paul Gottfried, himself Jewish, has done some good work on the Frankfurt school as well. Gottfried and McDonald are not too far off in their views, and they had a correspondence in the wake of Gottfried's review of Culture of Critique. Once you familiarize yourself with McDonald's work we can discuss how their views differ. It is amusing to note though that on the question of politics Gottfried (a friend of Rothbard's) reflects my views quite well. If you haven't read his book After Liberalism, I highly recommend it.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-49741377853276031382016-04-04T16:06:09.560-07:002016-04-04T16:06:09.560-07:00Maybe it would be better if we didn't slug t o...Maybe it would be better if we didn't slug t out over Lloyd George's comments. I admit I was baiting you to some extent with my endorsement. So your if your caricature comes from that specifically, it is indeed my fault.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-51150198089976268432016-04-04T15:58:48.324-07:002016-04-04T15:58:48.324-07:00LOL, A+.
LOL, A+.<br /><br />UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-44594971476854393342016-04-04T15:53:48.689-07:002016-04-04T15:53:48.689-07:00I would very much welcome a specific discussion on...I would very much welcome a specific discussion on this group. I will look into MacDonald's work.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-42087701876660442972016-04-04T15:46:10.224-07:002016-04-04T15:46:10.224-07:00I appreciate that man. I really do respect you an...I appreciate that man. I really do respect you and think you are an honest intellectual. The very fact you are publishing and engaging in this discourse is proof of that.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-79188562323950620322016-04-04T15:43:31.558-07:002016-04-04T15:43:31.558-07:00"This sure doesn’t sound like a full-on advoc..."This sure doesn’t sound like a full-on advocacy for Jews taking over and controlling the world"<br /><br />Make no mistake about that view does exist:<br /><br />"The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order, the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands"-Baruch Levy to Karl Marx.<br /><br />There was a very good reason that early 20th century right-wing movements associated the Left with organized Jewish power. I am only pointing out that there is some truth to this view. It does not follow from that that I believe Jews are omnipotent or the sole rulers of the world. Nor do they have a monopoly on State violence. Clearly the Chi-com demonstrate that otherwise. However, without Marx there would be no Mao.<br /><br />If I could summarize my view crudely, it is this: the West had AIDS and the Jews are a bad cold.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-80949524880555080472016-04-04T15:38:12.230-07:002016-04-04T15:38:12.230-07:00I am willing to guess that every single person on ...I am willing to guess that every single person on earth fell into one or another category of people who Stalin would punish "with death."bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-34387334346705981122016-04-04T15:37:12.029-07:002016-04-04T15:37:12.029-07:00“This is not my position. It is also an absurd car...“This is not my position. It is also an absurd caricature. Total straw man.”<br /><br />Came from the following, in the previous post:<br /><br />Unhappy, citing Lloyd George: “The Jewish race,”…“the Jews”…“the international power of the Jews."<br /><br />Unhappy, in response to Lloyd George’s comments: “Seems pretty reasonable to me.” <br /><br />Further from Unhappy: “Bionic, I am actually quite curious as to your position on…the Jews.”<br /><br />The Jews, the Jews, the Jews, the international Jews. I get it.<br /><br />I ask for names – which Jews? You give me men who never picked up a gun (I haven’t checked but I am exaggerating for effect).<br />bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-12701566115858480352016-04-04T15:34:47.645-07:002016-04-04T15:34:47.645-07:00"... I am getting the impression that is not ..."... I am getting the impression that is not reciprocated."<br /><br />Apologies. I am quite sensitive to this issue of lumping people into groups. I have personal reasons to both hate the practice and employ the practice - either choice could be easily justified on a pragmatic basis based on my personal experience.<br /><br />I have decided to always hate the practice. This will come out in my responses on such discussions. I take a hammer to it whenever it appears the gopher is coming out of the hole.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-89442396487989139302016-04-04T15:14:47.706-07:002016-04-04T15:14:47.706-07:00"those who suggest that the State of Israel s..."those who suggest that the State of Israel somehow rules the Anglo power."<br /><br />Hilaire Belloc was one of the first to put forward that view in "The Jews."(1922):<br /><br />"Marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood was the exception"<br /><br />"Specifically Jewish institutions, such as Freemasonry (which the Jews had inaugurated as a sort of bridge between themselves and their hosts in the seventeenth century) were particularly strong in Britain, and there arose a political tradition, active, and ultimately to prove of great importance, whereby the British state was tacitly accepted by foreign governments as the official protector of the Jews in other countries. It was Britain which was expected to intervene [wherever Jewish persecution took place and] to support the Jewish financial energies throughout the world, and to receive in return the benefit of that connection."UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-66252606230509556782016-04-04T15:06:45.976-07:002016-04-04T15:06:45.976-07:00What was your response to your caller?What was your response to your caller?UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-62856758390458903292016-04-04T15:05:45.723-07:002016-04-04T15:05:45.723-07:00This is largely correct.This is largely correct.UnhappyConservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03120041008604859202noreply@blogger.com