tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post5742505455051887466..comments2024-03-28T09:59:13.754-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: Nationbionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-11296319915936139422017-04-05T15:51:38.267-07:002017-04-05T15:51:38.267-07:00Yes, that was the piece. I guess I only found it ...Yes, that was the piece. I guess I only found it recently.<br /><br />We will see about writing it. I have another idea, different subject. If I do it, it isn't a small project.<br /><br />So many keystrokes, so little time....bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-83282087892911680512017-04-05T15:12:36.176-07:002017-04-05T15:12:36.176-07:00Lol.
Do it anyways brah.
We can't afford thi...Lol.<br /><br />Do it anyways brah.<br /><br />We can't afford this horse a chance to stand up.<br /><br />Are you refering to this Tucker piece from March 8th?:<br />https://fee.org/articles/the-prehistory-of-the-alt-right/<br /><br />Or something more recent?<br /><br />Tucker is really having a hard time. He has swastikas spinning in his head non-stop. After taking pathetic shots at intellectual titans like Spengler, Schmitt, and Carlyle, he completely ignores the advancements of racial science in the 20th century (http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/), parrots anti-german atrocity propaganda, and goes on to warn his readers away from the "altright."<br /><br />[If you are feeling tempted toward the Alt-right, look at your progenitors: do you like what you see?]<br /><br />LMAO!<br /><br />He is literally doing the argumentum ad holocaustum. The dates he gives in his "history" end in 1944, because as we know history ended in 1944 (well actually 45'). Basically you go from Carlyle to Spengler to jews being gassed in fake shower rooms and turned into soap (which to be clear never happened).<br /><br />Lazy and SAD!<br /><br />The whole thing is just "history has ended and liberalism has won, avert your delicate eyes from the heretics."<br /><br />However, this begs the question: why are you writing this article Jeff? Are you mad brah? You seem mad.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-62034251999260027612017-04-05T14:00:22.902-07:002017-04-05T14:00:22.902-07:00UC
Tucker recently wrote something on the history...UC<br /><br />Tucker recently wrote something on the history of the Alt-right; as an aside, not my issue to critique, but might be worth a look for you.<br /><br />Anyway, it gave me a thought about the left-libertarians... and you basically just wrote the post: a listing of all of the left-lib positions that also are either supported by the state and / or are supportive of the state.<br /><br /><br /><br />I may still write the post anyway... but you really popped my bubble with this comment.<br /><br />:-(bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-9266555483203584572017-04-05T12:43:48.989-07:002017-04-05T12:43:48.989-07:00Excellent post.
Rothbard's admiration for H...Excellent post. <br /><br />Rothbard's admiration for H.L Mencken's style really shows with gems like "aggressively overlook the obvious,"- I am going to have to steal that.<br /><br />Speaking of the obvious.<br /><br />Obvious questions for libertarians:<br /><br />"Why does the democratic party want more immigrants?"<br /><br />"Why is the push for open borders only in white countries?"<br /><br />"Why are southerners flooding into Europe?"<br /><br />"Why does the jewish media lie about the age, nationality, and asylum status of migrants?"<br /><br />"Why are migrants who commit crimes, many of which are against minors, treated with such leniency while political dissidents have the book thrown at them?"<br /><br />"Why do white gentile libertarians hate their own race?"<br /><br />The list goes on.....<br /><br />The problem with the liberal worldview and its insistence on individual freedom and the absence of "force" is that "people" of the cultural marxist bent will just redefine whatever they don't like as force. And force is bad mmmmk.<br /><br />There is a simple fact that gets brushed under the rug all too often in these debates. Regardless of what I believe *should* be the case, people *do* in fact prefer to be around their own kind. There are plenty of "muh studies" to demonstrate this but you folks don't need those. Just use your brain. Would the State need to prevent restrictive covenants or pass the Civil Rights Act if it didn't *require* force to break up ethnically homogeneous communities (again same principle for nations)?<br /><br />The world that Charles Johnson envisions requires a World State. I am not sure if he would be willing to come out and say that, but its the truth. What he will do is claim that nations are oppressive and anti-freedom so they need to be broken up.<br /><br />I don't know if any of you have ever debated an anarchist who opposes the use of money, but the debate is very similar.<br /><br />I ask: well what happens if people start using metals for indirect exchange in anarchyland<br /><br />him: that's a state<br /><br />me: the use of money is a state?<br /><br />him: yes<br /><br />me: so you will prevent this with force?<br /><br />him: yes<br /><br />me: like a state?<br /><br />When all is said and done every political ideology is predicated on violence. The question is about who is on the receiving end.Unhappy Conservative (2.0)https://www.blogger.com/profile/05647440445427537430noreply@blogger.com