tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post5104147665732853605..comments2024-03-22T17:43:18.211-07:00Comments on bionic mosquito: A Written Constitution: Protecting the State from the Peoplebionic mosquitohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-27524259656683209512013-05-22T03:25:07.293-07:002013-05-22T03:25:07.293-07:00Thank you. I have also noticed you have reference...Thank you. I have also noticed you have referenced other work of mine regarding the medieval period, for which I also thank you.bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-28928877510989405902013-05-21T23:32:54.863-07:002013-05-21T23:32:54.863-07:00Discovery of your article caused me to modify an a...Discovery of your article caused me to modify an article that I originally wrote in 2011. The modification links to your article and this site.<br /><br />Thank you for the marvelous insight!<br /><br />Dennis Wilson<br /><br />What *IS* a "Political Statement"? Why is One Needed? Who would Use It?<br />http://tinyurl.com/Political-StatementDennis Wilsonhttp://dennisleewilson.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-46503036909107092712012-11-04T19:55:13.059-08:002012-11-04T19:55:13.059-08:00Regarding the ancient ideas of kingship, see:
Jea...Regarding the ancient ideas of kingship, see:<br /><br />Jean Hani--Sacred Royalty--From the Pharaoh to the Most Christian King<br />http://www.amazon.com/Sacred-Royalty-Pharaoh-Most-Christian/dp/190809205XHenrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-52824578093278476072012-11-04T00:41:46.000-07:002012-11-04T00:41:46.000-07:00Even BEFORE considering Spooner's objections (...Even BEFORE considering Spooner's objections (which echo Paine's objections to the English Bill of Rights Act [1688] 2 Sess Will. & Mary 2), codified Constitutions are the political-parasite class' Trojan Horse.<br /><br />To furnish a timeline based on the standard 4chan /b/ model (which really ought to be used in academia, since it's so parsimonious)...<br /><br />(1) Get the masses to agree that the political classes will be constrained by such-and-so a document;<br />(2) declare that the 'judiciary' will arbitrate whether or not a given action violates the new Constitution;<br />(3) appoint your own cronies to the Bench, having had them prove their Statist chops over decades;<br />(4) ??<br />(5) PROFIT!!<br /><br />The side benefits are huge - you can give them a "Bill of Rights" which starts out as the MINIMUM set of NON-EXCLUSIVE, NON-EXHAUSTIVE Rights against which .gov may not aggress: less than a DECADE later you're passing the Alien and Sedition Acts, and 232 years later your pet robed geriatrics prepare to declare that (unreliable) drug dogs can sniff your door without violating the 4th Amendment.<br /><br />In other words, this "minimal" Bill of Rights goes from being the things against which government absolutely must not aggress, to being the last vestige of rights (and which may be parsed away by letting scum like Scalia decide if such-and-so a search is 'unreasonable'... this from a guy who is an Opus Dei nutbar!). <br /><br />Here's the thing ,right. I'm a Freemason (and a Mark Mason, and a member of a Holy Royal Arch Chapter, and a bunch of other things). We have tried to protect the masses from the depredations of the parasitic classes for five hundred years (at least) - but because we are not prepared to lie our asses off in order to get support, we can't get traction. People would rather hear that Obama (or Romney) has the solution to what ails ya.<br /><br />Here's the thing though. In the end we win.Kratoklasteshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08656600074436057305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-40099571952470978762012-10-29T10:31:24.473-07:002012-10-29T10:31:24.473-07:00Thank you. I have gone to the link and will spend...Thank you. I have gone to the link and will spend some time on this in the coming days.<br /><br />If you haven't previously seen it, you might see this:<br /><br />http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2012/03/anarchy-unknown-ideal.html bionic mosquitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12002548958078731031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-18796453381171873112012-10-29T10:01:35.083-07:002012-10-29T10:01:35.083-07:00You may also find "The Obviousness of Anarchy...You may also find "The Obviousness of Anarchy" by John Hasnas to be a good read. He also deals with pre-modern law in a very enlightening way.<br />http://voluntaryboundaries.blogsome.com/2011/01/12/the-obviousness-of-anarchy-by-john-hasnas/Puck T. Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11165510652453834268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648884752216444797.post-36483642780762506162012-10-29T05:33:21.587-07:002012-10-29T05:33:21.587-07:00Kern's book is available at http://archive.org...Kern's book is available at http://archive.org/details/KingshipAndLawInTheMiddleAges. Daniel v. Wachterhttp://von-wachter.denoreply@blogger.com